Affiliation:
1. Resource Recovery Research Group (Re3G), Department of Environment Science and Engineering, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45200, Nepal
2. Department of Geography and City & Regional Planning, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740, USA
3. Department of Civil & Architectural Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
Abstract
In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) method has been used to evaluate the environmental impacts of various municipal solid waste (MSW) management system scenarios in Banepa municipality, Nepal, in terms of global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), human toxicity potential (HTP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP), and photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP). There are at least six possible scenarios of MSW management in Banepa: the current or baseline scenario (Scenario 1); composting with landfilling (Scenario 2); material recovery facility (MRF) recycling, composting, and landfilling (Scenario 3); MRF and anaerobic digestion (AD); composting, and landfilling (Scenario 4); MRF, composting, AD, and landfilling (Scenario 5); and, finally, incineration with landfilling (Scenario 6). Using both information from Ecoinvent 3.6 (2019) and published research articles, a spreadsheet tool based on the LCA approach was created. The impact of the recycling rate on each of the six abovementioned scenarios was evaluated using sensitivity analysis, which showed that the recycling rate can considerably decrease the life-cycle emissions from the MSW management system. Scenario 3 was found to have the least overall environmental impact with a GWP of 974.82 kg CO2 eq. per metric ton (t), EP of 0.04 kg PO4 eq./t, AP of 0.15 kg SO2 eq./t, HTP of 4.55 kg 1,4 DB eq./t, ADP of −0.03 kg Sb eq./t, and POCP of 0.06 kg C2H4 eq./t. By adoption of MRF and biological treatments such as composting and AD, environmental impact categories such as AP, EP, HTP, ADP, POCP, and GWP can be significantly reduced. The findings of this study can potentially serve as a reference for cities in the developing world in order to aid in both the planning and the operation of environmentally friendly MSW management systems.
Funder
Centre of Research for Environment, Energy and Water
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference33 articles.
1. Processing of municipal solid waste resources for a circular economy in China: An overview;Awasthi;Fuel,2022
2. Management strategies for anaerobic digestate of organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Current status and future prospects;Logan;Waste Manag. Res.,2019
3. IPCC (2006). Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, IPCC. Available online: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gp/bgp/5_1_CH4_Solid_Waste.pdf.
4. Uche, M.-A.M. (2014, January 16–21). Consideration of Emission Ratios in Integrated Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management Planning. Proceedings of the FIG Congress 2014: Engaging the Challenges-Enhancing the Relevance, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
5. Municipal solid waste management: Integrated analysis of environmental and economic indicators based on life cycle assessment;Paes;J. Clean. Prod.,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献