The Three-Dimensional Analytical and Governance Logic of China’s Digital Divide Bridging Policy

Author:

Qi Meng123,Zhang Bei34,Li Junjie13,Liu Bangfan13

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China

2. College of Marxism, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

3. Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China

4. Institute of Marxism, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China

Abstract

In the digital era, digital technology enables political, economic and social fields. However, while the digital divide is pervasive due to the influence of population, geography, the economy and other factors, blindly pushing digital change often leads to the further expansion of the risks of social inequality. This paper constructed a three-dimensional analytical framework of digital gap-bridging policies from the perspective of policy objectives, policy tools and policy effectiveness. Based on this framework, this paper used the content analysis method to conduct a quantitative analysis of 81 digital gap-bridging policies published in China and selected the PMC index model for policy evaluation. The result shows that the policy goal of bridging the digital divide in China mainly focuses on bridging the material access gap and the technology gap, while inadequate attention was paid to the attitude gap and the use gap; in terms of policy tools, there exists an unbalanced situation regarding supply tools, environment and demand tools, with the first one being emphasized more than the others; there is still policy “fatigue” regarding weak feedback and less incentive, though the internal consistency level of the policy is good and the policy structure is reasonable. Therefore, we should optimize policy objectives and policy tools to bridge the digital divide. We should not only consider whether there is “or not” on the equipment and whether there is “or not” on the technology, but also consider whether we want to “or not” on the attitude and feel “or not” on the use; we should not only “give” unilaterally through supply-oriented policies but also “cooperate” with each other through demand-oriented and environment-oriented tools to release the maximum potential of digital empowerment.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference81 articles.

1. Xi, J. (2022, November 21). Congratulatory Letter to World Internet Conference Wuzhen Summit, Available online: http://www.gov.cn.

2. Tong, X., and Wang, L. (2013). An empirical study on college students’ online ticket Purchasing: Taking 12306 System of Ministry of Transport as an example. E-Government, 100–108.

3. Singapore’s experience and inspiration in promoting “Internet plus government Services”;Liang;E-Government,2017

4. The digital divide of the aged: Expression form, motivation exploration and bridging path;Yang;Acad. J. Zhongzhou,2021

5. On the fairness of online education development;Xue;China Educ. Technol.,2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3