Comparative Study of Heat-Discharging Kinetics of Fe-Substituted Mn2O3/Mn3O4 Being Subjected to Long-Term Cycling for Thermochemical Energy Storage
Author:
Gokon Nobuyuki12ORCID,
Ohashi Fumiya2,
Sawaguri Hiroki2,
Hayashi Kosuke2
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University, 8050 Ikarashi 2-nocho, Niigata 950-2181, Japan
2. Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, 8050 Ikarashi 2-nocho, Niigata 950-2181, Japan
Abstract
The heat-discharging kinetics of an iron-substituted Mn2O3/Mn3O4 redox pair subjected to long-term thermal cycling tests using a temperature swing process at high temperatures was investigated for next-generation concentrated solar power plants equipped with thermochemical energy storage. The heat-discharge mode kinetics for long-term thermal-cycled samples have never been reported. Additionally, comparisons of the heat-discharge mode kinetics for both long-term thermal-cycled and as-prepared samples have never been discussed. In terms of the reproducibility and sustainability of thermochemical energy storage, kinetic evaluations of samples with thermally stable morphologies subjected to long-term thermal cycling at high temperatures are important for next-generation solar thermal power plants. For the long-term thermal-cycled sample, the A2 model based on the Avrami–Erofeev reaction describes the discharging mode behavior in a fractional conversion range of 0–0.24, the contracting area (R2) model best fits in a fractional conversion range of 0.24–0.50, and the third-order (F3) model matches in a fractional conversion range of 0.50–0.70. For the as-prepared sample, the power-law (P2) model describes the behavior of the first part of the discharging mode, whereas the Avrami–Erofeev (A4) model best fits the last half of the discharging mode. The predicted theoretical models for both samples were compared with previous kinetic data.
Funder
the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Challenging Research
JSPS KAKENHI
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference80 articles.
1. (2023, February 07). Ember, Global Electricity Review 2021, For Further Discussion, See Power Section in this Chapter, and Market and Industry Chapter. Available online: https://ember-climate.org/project/global-electricity-review-2021.
2. REN21 (2022, October 22). Renewables 2021 Global Status Report, Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, 01 Global Overview, p. 33. Available online: https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/GSR2021_Full_Report.pdf.
3. Potential for concentrating solar power to provide baseload and dispatchable power;Pfenninger;Nat. Clim. Chang.,2014
4. Review of technology: Thermochemical energy storage for concentrated solar power plants;Prieto;Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,2016
5. Modeling and control of a solar thermal power plant with thermal energy storage;Powell;Chem. Eng. Sci.,2012