National Security as a Value-Added Proposition for Advanced Nuclear Reactors: A U.S. Focus

Author:

Gattie David1,Hewitt Michael2

Affiliation:

1. College of Engineering, Center for International Trade & Security, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA

2. IP3 Corporation, Allied Nuclear Partners, 7900 Tysons One Place, Suite 400, McLean, VA 22182, USA

Abstract

The U.S. has transitioned from being the 20th-century global leader in civilian nuclear power to a nation searching for ways to revive its once-dominant nuclear enterprise. The future of U.S. civilian nuclear power transcends that of a science and technology issue and, fundamentally, is a policy issue. This is a policy paper that uses a nuclear power policy framework to analyze current and historical U.S. civilian nuclear power policy and to identify weaknesses and deficiencies that need to be overcome in order for the U.S. to (1) leverage advanced nuclear reactors as a domestic technology to meet energy security and reliability objectives under carbon constraints, (2) operationalize national security as a priority objective and (3) restore the U.S. as a major global exporter of nuclear technology. The results of this analysis indicate that the national security implications of U.S. nuclear power have been marginalized in general due to the domestic market challenges of competing with less expensive and oftentimes more socially acceptable technologies, as well as the international challenges of competing with state-owned nuclear enterprises. The results are then discussed and used for making three following policy recommendations: (1) conduct a U.S. nuclear industrial base review; (2) create a demand signal using U.S. military installations; and (3) shift away from a sell-side nuclear vendor model for global exports to a buy-side model brokered by a third-party integrator that can work with multiple U.S. nuclear partners.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction

Reference143 articles.

1. Tice, D. (2023, May 18). Fastest Path to Universal Energy? Let the Market Decide. World Economic Forum, 9 May 2014. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2014/05/africa-forum-energy-access-social-entrepreneur/.

2. Bade, G. (2023, May 18). Electricity Markets: States Reassert Authority over Power Generation. Utility Dive, 15 October 2018. Available online: https://www.utilitydive.com/news/electricity-markets-states-reassert-authority-over-power-generation/539658/.

3. Hartman, D. (2023, May 18). No Administration, Conservative or Liberal, Should Pick Winners and Losers. National Review, 19 January 2018. Available online: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/01/conservative-energy-policy-let-market-decide/.

4. United States Climate Alliance (2023, May 18). Governors’ Climate Resilience Playbook. Available online: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5a4cfbfe18b27d4da21c9361/t/6186adf2875b2e694bdd0434/1636216308401/USCA+2021+Governors%27+Climate+Resilience+Playbook.pdf.

5. Gattie, D. (2022, January 18–20). U.S. Energy and Electric Power Policy: The National Security Imperative. Proceedings of the North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives Association Annual Meeting, Mandan, ND, USA.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Nuclear energy and its role in decarbonization: Scenarios and perspectives;Decarbonization Strategies and Drivers to Achieve Carbon Neutrality for Sustainability;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3