Mineralogical Insights into PGM Recovery from Middle Group (1–4) Chromite Tailings

Abstract

Variations in the recovery of platinum group metals (PGMs) are often attributed to mineralogical and other natural ore-type variations. To increase the recovery of PGMs by the flotation process, a comprehensive understanding of gangue and valuable minerals is essential for optimising the extraction and processing of metals. Recoveries may be improved if the questions of how, where, and why losses occur can be answered with a certain degree of confidence. A requirement is the availability of statistically reliable mineralogical data. The PGMs of MG-1–4 chromite tailings dumps of the western limb of the Bushveld complex (BC) were studied in detail to unravel the PGMs and the nature of the platinum group minerals in the sample. Characterisation of the chromite tailings via deportment analysis revealed that the sample contained a significant amount of 3E PGM + Au (Pt, Pd, Ru, and Au) and was concentrated in the -25 µm fraction. The results of automated mineralogical analysis showed that the sample was composed of the PGE-sulphides group, comprising 63.6 vol%, PGE-sulfarsenides 10.4 vol%, PGE-arsenides 1.3 vol%, PGE-bismuth tellurides 3.3 vol%, PGMs-alloy 4.1 vol%, and Laurite comprising 17.3 vol% of the total PGE population. The sample was composed of 66.5 vol% of liberated PGMs, 0.2 vol% attached to liberated BMS, 27.3 vol% of PGMs attached to or locked within silicate or oxide gangue composite particles, 0.2 vol% of PGMs associated with BMS attached to silicate or oxide gangue particles, and a low proportion (5.8 vol%) of PGMs reported being locked within gangue or oxide particles. The majority of PGM grains observed were reported in the fast-floating category (64.4 vol%), 27.6 vol% in the slow-floating 1 category, 2.2 vol% in the slow-floating 2 category, and 5.8 vol% to the non-floating category. The results of the study revealed that the PGMs of MG 1–4 chromite tailings were liberated; however, the low liberation index (<0.2) suggested that a significant portion of PGMs remained trapped within gangue, hindering their recovery. This highlights the need for effective comminution (crushing and grinding) to achieve better liberation. The sample contained fine particles that were more prone to being lost in the tailings and to lowering recovery due to the slimes coating valuable minerals. The recovery of the PGMs from this complex’s polymetallic bodies of low-grade and complex mineralogy will be insufficient with traditional methods and thus innovation is needed. Innovation like advanced comminution, novel flotation equipment or reagents, selective leaching and bioprocessing can overcome these challenges.