Intercomparison of Landsat OLI and JPSS VIIRS Using a Combination of RadCalNet Sites as a Common Reference

Abstract

Independent radiometric data collected from multiple ground sites as part of vicarious calibration activities can be combined to harmonize the data products of Earth observation sensors with different temporal, spectral, and spatial resolutions. Recent coordinated international efforts for open fiducial reference measurements have provided the worldwide user community with new ways to explore the calibration and harmonization of data produced by the sensors. To be correct, the results from each ground system must be traceable to the same well-understood standard system, and ideally to the international system of units (SI). Additionally, the calibration test site should be homogeneous over an area larger than the spatial resolutions of each sensor, so that ground measurements are representative of the area seen by the sensors being calibrated. Here, we use a combination of independent and SI-traceable radiometric data provided from two sites of the Radiometric Calibration Network (RadCalNet) to compare the radiometric response of sensors with different spectral and spatial resolutions that operate on different orbits. These sensors are Operational Land Imagers (OLI) of the Landsat-8 and Landsat-9 missions, and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suites (VIIRS) of the Suomi-National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System Preparatory Project (SNPP) and Joint Polar Satellite System-1 (JPSS-1) missions. The sensor radiometric responses are compared via temporal averaging of the ratios of top-of-atmosphere reflectance values for each sensor to those reported by RadCalNet. Our intercomparison results show that these on-orbit sensors are calibrated within their absolute radiometric uncertainties. The absolute radiometric uncertainties of single-sensor over single-site intercomparisons at 550 nm is between 5% and 6%. Having the opportunity to look at the intercomparison results of Landsat-9 OLI compared to each calibration site individually and then in combination allowed us to investigate potential systematic site-dependent biases. We did not observe significant site-dependent biases in the behavior of the four on-orbit sensors compared to the calibration sites. The absolute radiometric uncertainty of a single sensor over multiple-site intercomparisons at 550 nm is 5.4%. We further investigated site-dependent biases by looking at the double-ratio calibration coefficients of the on-orbit sensors, calculated with reference to those sites.