Affiliation:
1. Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (hereafter drones) are rapidly replacing manned aircraft as the preferred tool used for aerial wildlife surveys, but questions remain about which survey protocols are most effective and least impactful on wildlife behaviors. We evaluated the effects of drone overflights on nontarget species to inform the development of a Florida mottled duck (MODU; Anas fulvigula fulvigula) survey. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate the effect of flight altitude on the behavior of marsh birds, (2) evaluate the effect of altitude on a surveyor’s ability to identify the species of detected birds, and (3) test protocols for upcoming MODU surveys. We flew 120 continuously moving transects at altitudes ranging from 12 to 91 m and modeled variables that influenced detection, species identification, and behavior of nontarget species. Few marsh birds were disturbed during drone flights, but we were unable to confidently detect birds at the two highest altitudes, and we experienced difficulties identifying the species of birds detected in video collected at 30 m. Our findings indicate that MODUs could be surveyed at altitudes as low as 12–30 m with minimal impact to adjacent marsh birds and that larger-bodied nontarget marsh species can be identified from videos collected during MODU drone surveys.
Funder
Florida’s State Game Trust Fund
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Computer Science Applications,Aerospace Engineering,Information Systems,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference36 articles.
1. Job-Related Mortality of Wildlife Workers in the United States, 1937–2000;Sasse;Wildl. Soc. Bull.,2003
2. Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Wildlife Research: Current and Future Applications of a Transformative Technology;Christie;Front. Ecol. Environ.,2016
3. Bushaw, J.D., Ringelman, K.M., and Rohwer, F.C. (2019). Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Survey Mesocarnivores. Drones, 3.
4. Drones Count Wildlife More Accurately and Precisely than Humans;Hodgson;Methods Ecol. Evol.,2018
5. Escape Responses of Terrestrial and Aquatic Birds to Drones: Towards a Code of Practice to Minimize Disturbance;Weston;J. Appl. Ecol.,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献