Prediction of Failure to Progress after Labor Induction: A Multivariable Model Using Pelvic Ultrasound and Clinical Data

Author:

Novillo-Del Álamo Blanca1,Martínez-Varea Alicia1234ORCID,Satorres-Pérez Elena1,Nieto-Tous Mar1ORCID,Modrego-Pardo Fernando1,Padilla-Prieto Carmen1,García-Florenciano María Victoria1,Bello-Martínez de Velasco Silvia1,Morales-Roselló José12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain

2. Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain

3. Department of Medicine, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, 12006 Castellón de la Plana, Spain

4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Internacional de Valencia, 46002 Valencia, Spain

Abstract

Objective: Labor induction is one of the leading causes of obstetric admission. This study aimed to create a simple model for predicting failure to progress after labor induction using pelvic ultrasound and clinical data. Material and Methods: A group of 387 singleton pregnant women at term with unruptured amniotic membranes admitted for labor induction were included in an observational prospective study. Clinical and ultrasonographic variables were collected at admission prior to the onset of contractions, and labor data were collected after delivery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to create several models to predict cesarean section due to failure to progress. Afterward, the most accurate and reproducible model was selected according to the lowest Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) with a high area under the curve (AUC). Results: Plausible parameters for explaining failure to progress were initially obtained from univariable analysis. With them, several multivariable analyses were evaluated. Those parameters with the highest reproducibility included maternal age (p < 0.05), parity (p < 0.0001), fetal gender (p < 0.05), EFW centile (p < 0.01), cervical length (p < 0.01), and posterior occiput position (p < 0.001), but the angle of descent was disregarded. This model obtained an AIC of 318.3 and an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.76–0.86, p < 0.0001) with detection rates of 24% and 37% for FPRs of 5% and 10%. Conclusions: A simplified clinical and sonographic model may guide the management of pregnancies undergoing labor induction, favoring individualized patient management.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference37 articles.

1. Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction;Carlson;J. Midwifery Women’s Health,2021

2. The validity of ultrasonography in predicting the outcomes of labour induction;Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.,2015

3. Ultrasound in labor: Clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation;Rizzo;J. Perinat. Med.,2022

4. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: Intrapartum ultrasound;Ghi;Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.,2018

5. Fuster-Rojas, S.I., and Valero-Domínguez, J. (2014). Obstetricia y Ginecología, guía de actuación, Editorial Médica Panamericana. [2nd ed.].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3