Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
Abstract
In the shipbuilding, construction, automotive, and aerospace industries, welding is still a crucial manufacturing process because it can be utilized to create massive, intricate structures with exact dimensional specifications. These kinds of structures are essential for urbanization considering they are used in applications such as tanks, ships, and bridges. However, one of the most important types of structural damage in welding continues to be fatigue. Therefore, it is necessary to take this phenomenon into account when designing and to assess it while a structure is in use. Although traditional methodologies including strain life, linear elastic fracture mechanics, and stress-based procedures are useful for diagnosing fatigue failures, these techniques are typically geometry restricted, require a lot of computing time, are not self-improving, and have limited automation capabilities. Meanwhile, following the conception of machine learning, which can swiftly discover failure trends, cut costs, and time while also paving the way for automation, many damage problems have shown promise in receiving exceptional solutions. This study seeks to provide a thorough overview of how algorithms of machine learning are utilized to forecast the life span of structures joined with welding. It will also go through their drawbacks and advantages. Specifically, the perspectives examined are from the views of the material type, application, welding method, input parameters, and output parameters. It is seen that input parameters such as arc voltage, welding speed, stress intensity factor range, crack growth parameters, stress histories, thickness, and nugget size influence output parameters in the manner of residual stress, number of cycles to failure, impact strength, and stress concentration factors, amongst others. Steel (including high strength steel and stainless steel) accounted for the highest frequency of material usage, while bridges were the most desired area of application. Meanwhile, the predominant taxonomy of machine learning was the random/hybrid-based type. Thus, the selection of the most appropriate and reliable algorithm for any requisite matter in this area could ultimately be determined, opening new research and development opportunities for automation, testing, structural integrity, structural health monitoring, and damage-tolerant design of welded structures.
Reference132 articles.
1. Vodzyk, D. (2016). Fracture and Fatigue Analysis of Welded Structures using Finite Element Analysis. [Master’s Thesis, Carleton University Ottawa].
2. (2023, November 27). How to Predict Fatigue Life in Welds, COMSOL. Available online: https://www.comsol.com/blogs/how-to-predict-the-fatigue-life-of-welds/.
3. Effect of weld toe geometry on fatigue life of lap fillet welded ultra high strength steel joints;Tsuyoshi;Int. J. Fatigue,2018
4. Fatigue failure of aircraft components;Bhaumik;Eng. Fail. Anal.,2008
5. Lassen, T., and Recho, N. (2013). Fatigue Life Analysis of Welded Structures: Flaws, Wiley.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献