Author:
Aristei David,Gallo Manuela
Abstract
This paper contributes to analyze the relationship between firms’ recourse to different types of external support and adoption of environmental sustainability practices. To this aim, we consider both direct financial support and indirect support, in the form of advice and consulting services, upon which the firm relies on in its efforts to be more resource efficient. The empirical analysis uses data on 6595 manufacturing firms from 35 European countries, taken from the third and fourth waves of the Flash Eurobarometer survey “Small and Medium Enterprises, Resource Efficiency and Green Markets”. Our empirical findings suggest that firms using external financing and external advice are more likely to implement greening investments and practices. Moreover, we provide strong empirical evidence that external support significantly contributes to increase the benefits from the adoption of resource efficiency actions in terms of production cost reduction. This study further contributes to the existing literature by highlighting the heterogenous effects of direct and indirect external support on the environmental sustainability actions of both SMEs and large firms.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference43 articles.
1. Investing in Resource Efficiency—Economics and Politics of Financing the Resource Transistion;Flachenecker,2018
2. Financial barriers and environmental innovations: evidence from EU manufacturing firms
3. A Strategy for SMEs for a Sustainable and Digital Europe,2020
4. Eco-innovation in SMEs. Future Brief 22. Brief Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit,2020
5. Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献