Exploring Food Waste from a Segmentation and Intervention Perspective—What Design Cues Matter? A Narrative Review
-
Published:2024-08-16
Issue:16
Volume:16
Page:7043
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Norton Victoria1ORCID, Lignou Stella1ORCID, Oloyede Omobolanle O.2ORCID, Vásquez Geraldine3, Arreola Paulina Anguiano1, Alexi Niki3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Sensory Science Centre, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Harry Nursten Building, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6DZ, UK 2. Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, University of Surrey, Dorothy Hodgkin Building, Stag Hill, Guilford GU2 7XH, UK 3. Food Quality and Preference and Society Science Team, iSense Lab, Department of Food Science, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, Agro Food Park 48, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
Abstract
Food waste is a global challenge and fits within the remit of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 12; hence, strategies to promote engagement, especially at an individual level, are key to maximise societal benefits. Accordingly, it is important to understand the relevant design cues from a segmentation and intervention viewpoint for food waste. This review aims to explore (i) common characteristics associated with food waste segmentation and (ii) delivery formats typically utilised in food waste interventions. Overall, it was apparent that food waste encompasses a broad term per se, resulting in varying quantification approaches, which subsequently contribute to heterogenicity of the findings. However, key themes emerged, such as gender, age, food waste level, motivation, engagement and environment as common components from the food waste segmentation. Visual (text, infographic, booklets), audio/oral (videos, door stepping, coaching), interactive (recipe, community engagement, diary/notepad) and touch (magnet, bins, stickers) were the dominant delivery formats used in food waste interventions; suggesting that a combination of senses is required to successfully promote engagement and behavioural effects. Going forwards, more consistency in measuring food waste is needed to enable comparison (within and between countries), coupled with the consideration of design cues, so that toolkits can be developed to meet the needs of differing consumer segments.
Reference76 articles.
1. United Nations (2024, May 06). The Sustainable Development Agenda. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/. 2. United Nations (2023, October 30). Goal 12: Ensure Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/. 3. WRAP (2024, April 28). UK Food Waste & Food Surplus—Key Facts. Available online: https://wrap.org.uk/sites/default/files/2024-01/WRAP-Food-Surplus-and-Waste-in-the-UK-Key-Facts%20November-2023.pdf. 4. European Commission (2024, July 26). Food Waste. Available online: https://food.ec.europa.eu/safety/food-waste_en. 5. Malik, X., Smith, L., Stewart, I., and Burnett, N. (2024, May 01). Food Waste in the UK. Available online: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7552/CBP-7552.pdf.
|
|