The Reception of Bantu Divination in Modern South Africa: African Traditional Worldview in Interaction with European Thought

Author:

Kleinhempel Ullrich Relebogilwe1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa

Abstract

Bantu African divination is firmly established in South Africa in the context of modernity and is protected, endorsed and regulated by law. It is received in the therapeutic field. Important explorations were performed in the early 20th century by psychiatrists and psychoanalysts of Jungian orientation. Their cultural, philosophical, spiritual, and academic backgrounds are relevant to this reception. Jungian thought, Spiritual Spiritism, and traditions of European philosophy of divination resonated with the experience, observation, and understanding of Bantu divination. (‘Bantu’ designates the cultural and linguistic realm from Cameroon and Kenya southwards). Religious-philosophical traditions, as well as the conceptualisations of ‘divination’ by Plutarch and Iamblichus, are preserved. The reception and appreciation of Bantu divination in South Africa emerged from it, and resonated with these European traditions of religious-philosophical thought. Out of this development a distinct ‘South African modernity’ emerges. A parallel reception process developed in Brazil, in the belief systems of Umbanda and Kardecism. These developments are illustrated at present in the literatures of South Africa and Brazil, specifically in Afrikaans literature, black South African poetry and its poetics, and Magic Realism in Brazilian literature. Lastly, a perspective is offered of modernity’s reception by black scholars and diviners, continually interacting with Jungian psychoanalysis.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference85 articles.

1. Amado, Jorge (1988). O Sumiço da Santa: Uma História de Feitiçaria, Editora Record. [English ed.: The War of the Saints. New York: Bantam, 1993].

2. Berglund, Axel Ivar (1976). Zulu Thought-Patterns and Symbolism, C. Hurst.

3. Berner, Ulrich (1982). Untersuchungen zur Verwendung des Synkretismus-Begriffes, Harrassowitz.

4. Bleek, Wilhelm H. I., and Lloyd, Lucy C. (1911). Specimens of Bushmen Folklore, George and Allen.

5. Hammer, Olav, and Rothstein, Mikael (2013). Handbook of the Theosophical Current, Brill.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3