Affiliation:
1. Department of Asian Studies, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
Abstract
By transcribing, punctuating, and analyzing the Statue Construction Account undertaken in 798, this article attempts a refreshed study of the construction background of the Buddhist statues and niches at Huazhi Temple 花置寺 in Qionglai. The aim of this article is twofold. Firstly, it brings to light an eminent monk named Sengcai, who has been forgotten in both secular and monastic histories. Secondly, it tries to clarify the social network formed by various figures recorded in the Statue Construction Account by tracing their roles and relationships in the course of constructing the Buddhist niches. The analysis of this article expounds that in the process of the statue construction project, Sengcai made full use of his social network to support this project and to seek protection for Huazhi Temple. The construction activities of the Buddhist niches at Huazhi Temple not only brought people of different identities together through politics, Buddhism, economics or kinship, but also connected Qiongzhou (in Sichuan) and the capital of Chang’an to the formation of a multi-identity and cross-regional network of power in which emperor, officials, monks, military generals, craftsmen, literati, and so on, participated and interacted with each other. The whole social network can be divided into two sub-networks in Chang’an and Qiongzhou, with Sengcai as the central figure connecting these two sub-networks. Although the Buddhist niches of Huazhi Temple were carved in Qiongzhou, both the decisive preparatory work and the composition of the Statue Construction Account took place in Chang’an. Hence, the power of the Chang’an sub-network was greater than that of the one based in Qiongzhou. This means that the Buddhist niches at Huazhi Temple from Sengcai’s project were not merely a local project, but one that was strongly connected with the capital Chang’an in 798. Lastly, the Statue Construction Account in 798 at Huazhi Temple indicated mutual aid and support between Sichuan Buddhism and Chang’an Buddhism.
Reference50 articles.
1. “Tang Chang’an Zhangjingsi de weizhi” 唐長安章敬寺的位置 [Location of Zhangjing Temple in Chang’an of the Tang Dynasty];Cao;Zhongguo lishi dili luncong 中國歷史地理論叢 [Journal of Chinese Historical Geography],1991
2. “Hanlin xueshi bi ji zhubu” 翰林學士壁記注補 [Supplementary Annotations on the Notes Left on the Walls of Hanlin Academicians];Cen;Lishi yuyan yanjiu suo jikan 歷史語言研究所集刊 [Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica],1948
3. “Shaanxi Lingyou xian Lamamao shan Qianfo yuan Fojiao zaoxiang diaocha” 陝西麟遊縣喇嘛帽山千佛院佛教造像調查 [An Investigation of Buddhist Images in Qianfo Yuan on Mount Lamamao in Linyou County in Shaanxi];Chang;Kaogu yu wenwu 考古與文物 [Archaeology and Cultural Relics],2016
4. The Tang Buddhist Palace Chapels;Chen;Journal of Chinese Religions,2004
5. Chen, Jinhua (2010). Crossfire: Shingon-Tendai Strife as Seen in Two Twelfth-Century Polemics, with Special References to Their Background in Tang China, The International Institute for Buddhist Studies.