Affiliation:
1. Special Research Area ‘Interreligiosity’ (SIR), University College for Teacher Education of the Churches, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Abstract
This article adds an empirical contribution to international discussions on interreligious education, taking the point of view of the academic study of religion. It presents results from a Viennese research project that used a participant observation design to analyze one of the more recent pedagogical formats to deal with religious plurality at school—the so-called Interreligious Encounter Day (IED). More precisely this article focuses on the role of Ethics Education (EE) within the context of a specific IED that was organized in 2019. Along those lines, it highlights the ambiguity of IED practices at a school by presenting a threefold argument: first, the article makes the point that the IED opened up a space to explicitly make religion a subject of discussion at school. Second, it argues that—within the context of the IED—religion is constructed in a specific way that can be described as ‘school religion’. Third, it proposes that the observed IED format has the tendency to prioritize specific individual constructions of religion—especially those prompted by theology.
Reference58 articles.
1. Alberts, Wanda, Junginger, Horst, Neef, Katharina, and Wöstemeyer, Christina (2023). Handbuch Religionskunde, De Gruyter.
2. Arweck, Elisabeth, and Shipley, Heather (2019). Young People and the Diversity of (Non)Religious Identities in International Perspective, Springer.
3. Arweck, Elisabeth, and Jackson, Robert (2014). Religion, Education and Society, BRILL.
4. Auffarth, Christoph, Kippenberg, Hans G., and Michaels, Axel (2006). Wörterbuch der Religionen, Kröner.
5. Baumann, Martin, and Behloul, Samuel M. (2005). Religiöser Pluralismus. Empirische Studien und Analytische Perspektiven, Transcript.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献