Exploring Comprehension Strategies of Modular Process Models: A Combined Eye-Tracking and Concurrent Think-Aloud Study

Author:

Baß Julia1ORCID,Winter Michael2ORCID,Pryss Rüdiger2ORCID,Reichert Manfred1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany

2. Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany

Abstract

The study of complex process models often encounters challenges in terms of comprehensibility. This paper explores using modularization as a strategy to mitigate such challenges, notably the reduction in complexity. Previous research has delved into the comprehensibility of modularized process models, yet an unresolved question about the cognitive factors at play during their comprehension still needs to be answered. Addressing the latter, the paper presents findings from an innovative study combining eye-tracking and concurrent think-aloud techniques involving 25 participants. The study aimed to comprehend how individuals comprehend process models when presented in three different modular formats: flattened process models, models with grouped elements, and models with subprocesses. The results shed light on varying comprehension strategies employed by participants when navigating through these modularized process models. The paper concludes by suggesting avenues for future research guided by these insights.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference50 articles.

1. Alonso, G., Dadam, P., and Rosemann, M. (2007). Business Process Management. BPM 2007, Springer.

2. Kluza, K., and Nalepa, G.J. (2012, January 9–12). Proposal of square metrics for measuring Business Process Model complexity. Proceedings of the 2012 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Wrocław, Poland.

3. Mendling, J., Moser, M., Neumann, G., Verbeek, H., Dongen, B., and van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2022, May 20). A Quantitative Analysis of Faulty EPCs in the SAP Reference Model; BPM-06-08, BPM Center Report. Available online: https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/a-quantitative-analysis-of-faulty-epcs-in-the-sap-reference-model.

4. Meersman, R., and Tari, Z. (2007). On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS, Springer.

5. Seven Process Modeling Guidelines (7 pmg);Mendling;Inf. Softw. Technol.,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3