Feedback Interventions in Motor Recovery of Lateropulsion after Stroke: A Literature Review and Case Series

Author:

Gomez-Risquet Maria1ORCID,Hochsprung Anja2,Magni Eleonora1,Luque-Moreno Carlos3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Seville, Spain

2. Unidad de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, 41009 Seville, Spain

3. Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Seville, Spain

Abstract

Lateropulsion is a post-stroke phenomenon marked by an active push of the body across the midline towards the more affected side and/or a resistance of the weight shift towards the less affected side. Within the mechanisms of treatment, feedback systems have been shown to be effective. The aim of the present study was to create a body of knowledge by performing a literature review on the use of feedback mechanisms in the treatment of lateropulsion and to report two cases of lateropulsion patients who had undergone feedback-based treatment. Methods: The review was performed across five different databases (Embase, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEDro) up to February 2024, and haptic feedback intervention was incorporated into the case series (with lateropulsion and ambulation capacity as the main variables). Results: In total, 211 records were identified and 6 studies were included after the review of the literature. The most used feedback modality was visual feedback. In the case series, positive results were observed from the intervention, particularly in the recovery of lateropulsion and balance, as well as in the improvement of gait for one patient. Patients demonstrated good adherence to the intervention protocol without adverse effects. Conclusions: Visual feedback is the most commonly used feedback modality in lateropulsion patients but other mechanisms such as haptic feedback also are feasible and should be taken into account. Larger sample sizes, extended follow-up periods, and the isolation of feedback mechanisms must be established to clarify evidence.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference85 articles.

1. Prevalence and Incidence of Ictus in Europe: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Soto;An. Sist. Sanit. Navar.,2022

2. SEMI, SEMERGEN, Freno al Ictus, FEI, and Feasan (2024, March 09). El Atlas Del Ictus En España. Available online: https://www.sen.es/actividades/91-articulos/2617-el-atlas-del-ictus.

3. Contraversive Pushing and Inattention of the Contralesional Hemispace;Lafosse;J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol.,2005

4. Pusher Syndrome in Stroke: Clinical, Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Investigation;Premoselli;Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med.,2001

5. Lateropulsion Prevalence after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Dai;Neurology,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3