Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Combined with Psychological Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
-
Published:2023-11-30
Issue:12
Volume:13
Page:1665
-
ISSN:2076-3425
-
Container-title:Brain Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Brain Sciences
Author:
Xu Xiaomin1, Xu Mei12ORCID, Su Yon1ORCID, Cao Thanh Vinh2, Nikolin Stevan12, Moffa Adriano12, Loo Colleen12, Martin Donel12
Affiliation:
1. Discipline of Psychiatry & Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia 2. Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
Abstract
(1) Background: Psychological interventions are effective in alleviating neuropsychiatric symptoms, though results can vary between patients. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been proven to improve clinical symptoms and cognition. It remains unclear whether rTMS can augment the efficacy of psychological interventions. (2) Methods: We examined the effects of rTMS combined with psychological interventions on clinical, functional, and cognitive outcomes from randomized controlled trials conducted in healthy and clinical populations. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases up to April 2023. (3) Results: Twenty-seven studies were ultimately included. Compared to sham rTMS combined with psychological interventions, active rTMS combined with psychological interventions significantly improved overall clinical symptoms (k = 16, SMD = 0.31, CIs 0.08 to 0.54, p < 0.01). We found that 10 or more sessions of rTMS combined with cognitive behavioural therapy significantly improved clinical outcomes overall (k = 3, SMD = 0.21, CIs 0.05 to 0.36, Z = 2.49, p < 0.01). RTMS combined with cognitive training (CT) significantly improved cognition overall compared to sham rTMS combined with CT (k = 13, SMD = 0.28, CIs 0.15 to 0.42, p < 0.01), with a significant effect on global cognition (k = 11, SMD = 0.45, CIs 0.21 to 0.68, p < 0.01), but not on the other cognitive domains. (4) Conclusion: The current results provide preliminary support for the augmentation effects of active rTMS on clinical and cognitive outcomes across diverse populations. Future clinical trials are required to confirm these augmentation effects for specific psychological interventions in specific clinical populations.
Subject
General Neuroscience
Reference82 articles.
1. Ricou, M., Marina, S., Vieira, P.M., Duarte, I., Sampaio, I., Regalado, J., and Canário, C. (2019). Psychological intervention at a primary health care center: Predictors of success. BMC Fam. Pract., 20. 2. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing;Iasiello;Nat. Hum. Behav.,2021 3. Tatti, E., Phillips, A.L., Paciorek, R., Romanella, S.M., Dettore, D., Di Lorenzo, G., Ruffini, G., Rossi, S., and Santarnecchi, E. (2022). Boosting psychological change: Combining non-invasive brain stimulation with psychotherapy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 142. 4. Adjunctive Psychotherapy for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-analysis;Miklowitz;JAMA Psychiatry,2021 5. American Psychiatric Association practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder;Gelenberg;Am. J. Psychiatry,2010
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|