Outcome Measures Utilized to Assess the Efficacy of Telerehabilitation for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Author:

Shariat Ardalan1,Najafabadi Mahboubeh Ghayour2,Nakhostin Ansari Noureddin34ORCID,Anastasio Albert T.5ORCID,Bagheri Kian6ORCID,Hassanzadeh Gholamreza178,Farghadan Mahsa9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Digital Health, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran

2. Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran 1439957131, Iran

3. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 141556559, Iran

4. Research Center for War-Affected People, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran

5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA

6. School of Osteopathic Medicine, Campbell University, Lillington, NC 27546, USA

7. Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran

8. Department of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran

9. Department of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Computer Engineering, Islamic Azad University of South Tehran Branch, Tehran 4147654919, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Outcome measures using telerehabilitation (TR) in the context of post-stroke rehabilitation are an area of emerging research. The current review assesses the literature related to TR for patients requiring post-stroke rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to survey the outcome measures used in TR studies and to define which parts of the International Organization of Functioning are measured in trials. Methods: TR studies were searched in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) from 2016 to June 2023. Two reviewers individually assessed the full text. Discrepancies regarding inclusion or exclusion were resolved by an additional reviewer. Results: A total of 24 studies were included in the current review. The findings were synthesized and presented taking into account their implications within clinical practice, areas of investigation, and strategic implementation. Conclusions: The scoping review has recognized a broad range of outcome measures utilized in TR studies, shedding light on gaps in the current literature. Furthermore, this review serves as a valuable resource for researchers and end users (such as clinicians and policymakers), providing insights into the most appropriate outcome measures for TR. There is a lack of studies examining the required follow-up after TR, emphasizing the need for future research in this area.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3