Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere

Author:

Wilkins Erik W.12,Young Richard J.2ORCID,Houston Daniel3,Kawana Eric3,Lopez Mora Edgar3ORCID,Sunkara Meghana S.4,Riley Zachary A.5,Poston Brach12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA

2. Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Program in Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA

3. School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA

4. Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA

5. Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) increases primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and improves motor performance when applied unilaterally to the dominant hemisphere. However, the influence of tDCS on contralateral M1 excitability both during and after application has not been quantified. The purpose was to determine the influence of tDCS applied to the dominant M1 on the excitability of the contralateral non-dominant M1. This study employed a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, within-subject crossover experimental design. Eighteen young adults performed two experimental sessions (tDCS, SHAM) in counterbalanced order separated by a one-week washout. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to quantify the excitability of the contralateral M1 to which anodal tDCS was applied for 20 min with a current strength of 1 mA. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were assessed in 5 TMS test blocks (Pre, D5, D10, D15, and Post). The Pre and Post TMS test blocks were performed immediately before and after tDCS application, whereas the TMS test blocks performed during tDCS were completed at the 5, 10, and 15 min stimulation timepoints. MEPs were analyzed with a 2 condition (tDCS, SHAM) × 5 test (Pre, D5, D10, D15, Post) within-subject ANOVA. The main effect for condition (p = 0.213), the main effect for test (p = 0.502), and the condition × test interaction (p = 0.860) were all not statistically significant. These results indicate that tDCS does not modulate contralateral M1 excitability during or immediately after application, at least under the current set of common tDCS parameters of stimulation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference78 articles.

1. Effects of Tdcs on Motor Learning and Memory Formation: A Consensus and Critical Position Paper;Buch;Clin. Neurophysiol.,2017

2. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: State of the Art 2008;Nitsche;Brain Stimul.,2008

3. Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation;Stagg;Neuroscientist,2011

4. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation—Update 2011;Nitsche;Restor. Neurol. Neurosci.,2011

5. Transcranial Dc Stimulation (Tdcs): A Tool for Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Clinical Studies in Brain Stimulation;Gandiga;Clin. Neurophysiol.,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3