Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach

Author:

Figueredo Luisa F.1ORCID,Martínez Andrea L.2ORCID,Suarez-Meade Paola1,Marenco-Hillembrand Lina1,Salazar Andrés Felipe2,Pabon Daniela2,Guzmán Juan2ORCID,Murguiondo-Perez Renata3,Hallak Hana4ORCID,Godo Alex5,Sandoval-Garcia Carolina6,Ordoñez-Rubiano Edgar G.7ORCID,Donaldson Angela8,Chaichana Kaisorn L.1,Peris-Celda María4,Bendok Bernard R.9,Samson Susan L.110ORCID,Quinones-Hinojosa Alfredo1,Almeida Joao Paulo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA

2. Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia

3. Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, Huixquilucan C.P. 52786, Mexico

4. Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA

5. Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Pompeu Fabra & Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08002 Barcelona, Spain

6. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

7. Department of Neurological Surgery, Fundación Universitaria de las Ciencias de la Salud, Hospital de San José—Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá 111711, Colombia

8. Department of Otolaryngology (ENT), Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA

9. Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA

10. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA

Abstract

In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approach (TCA). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the criteria for selecting different approaches. To explore the current results of EEA and discuss its role in the management of craniopharyngiomas, we performed MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS searches from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, the extent of resection, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed through an X2 and Fisher exact test, and a comparison between quantitative variables through a Kruskal–Wallis and verified with post hoc Bonferroni. The tumor volume was similar in both groups (EEA 11.92 cm3, -TCA 13.23 cm3). The mean follow-up in months was 39.9 for EEA and 43.94 for TCA, p = 0.76). The EEA group presented a higher visual improvement rate (41.96% vs. 25% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 7.7). Permanent DI was less frequent with EEA (29.20% vs. 67.40% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 0.2). CSF Leaks occurred more frequently with EEA (9.94% vs. 0.70% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 15.8). Recurrence rates were lower in the EEA group (EEA 15.50% vs. for TCA 21.20%, p = 0.04, OR 0.7). Our results demonstrate that, in selected cases, EEA for resection of craniopharyngiomas is associated with better results regarding visual preservation and extent of tumor resection. Postoperative CSF leak rates associated with EEA have improved compared to the historical series. The decision-making process should consider each person’s characteristics; however, it is noticeable that recent data regarding EEA justify its widespread application as a first-line approach in centers of excellence for skull base surgery.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Neuroscience

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3