Drug-Free Noninvasive Thermal Nerve Block: Validation of Sham Devices

Author:

Fishman Michael A.1ORCID,Chitneni Ahish2ORCID,Abd-Elsayed Alaa3,Grodofsky Samuel4,Scherer Ashley M.1,Schetzner Brendan5,Klusek Malvina6,Popielarski Stephen R.7,Meloni Stephen7,Falowski Steven8,Kim Philip9,Slavin Konstantin V.1011ORCID,Silberstein Stephen D.12

Affiliation:

1. Center for Pain Control PC, Lancaster, PA 19610, USA

2. Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital—Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY 10065, USA

3. Department of Anesthesia, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53726, USA

4. Philadelphia Smart Pain & Wellness, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19610, USA

5. Department of Anesthesiology, St Elizabeths Medical Center, Brighton, MA 02135, USA

6. Peconic Bay Medical Center/Northwell Health, New York, NY 10065, USA

7. Thermaquil, Inc., Philadelphia, PA 19610, USA

8. Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA 19610, USA

9. Center for Interventional Pain Spine, LLC, Wilmington, DE 19803, USA

10. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA

11. Neurology Service, Jesse Brown Veterans Administration Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

12. Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

Abstract

Headache is a leading cause of disability and suffering. One major challenge in developing device treatments is demonstrating their efficacy given devices’ often-high placebo rate. This paper reviews the importance of validating sham devices as part of finalizing the design for larger-scale prospective randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic headache as well as the results of a prospective, single-blind trial to validate two potential sham noninvasive thermal nerve block devices. Study participants were trained to self-administer thermal nerve block treatment using sham devices in an office visit. Two different sham systems with different temperature profiles were assessed. Devices were offered for patients to use daily at-home for one week to assess the durability of sham placebo effects before participants were given active treatment in a second office visit followed by another optional week of self-administered active treatment at-home use. Sham treatments reduced pain scores by an average of 31% from 6.0 ± 2.3 to 4.3 ± 3.3, including two participants who fell asleep during the in-office treatment and woke up with no pain, but whose pain recurred after returning home during at-home use of the sham system. In-office active treatments reduced pain scores by 52% from 6.7 ± 2.1 to 3.3 ± 2.9 with sustained pain relief during optional at-home use. Successful blinding for the study was confirmed with an ideal Bang’s Blinding Index of 0 and an ideal James’ Blinding Index of 1. Both the sham and active treatments were viewed by participants as highly credible, and credibility increased from the beginning to end of sham treatments on average.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3