Plant-Soil Carbon Storage in Dynamic Succession of Ecological Restoration in National Grassland Natural Park
-
Published:2023-11-10
Issue:22
Volume:15
Page:15837
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Wang Junfang1,
Han Guodong1,
Wang Zhaoming2,
Yun Jinfeng1,
Wang Zhongwu1,
Li Zhiguo1,
Lv Shijie1ORCID,
Qin Jie1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010030, China
2. Mengcao Ecological Environment (Group) Co., Hohhot 010030, China
Abstract
Ecological restoration has a positive impact on global climate change. How plant-soil stores carbon in degraded grassland ecological restoration requires long-term monitoring and support. To reveal the dynamics of plant-soil carbon storage in the succession process of ecological restoration, compare the effects of artificial interference and natural restoration, and determine the impact of climate change and biodiversity on vegetation soil carbon storage, we conducted a study in National Grassland Natural Park, which is located on the southern foot of the Yinshan Mountains in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China. Based on long restoration chronosequences (2012–2022), using a space-for-time substitution approach and one-way ANOVA tests, Pearson correlation and structural equation modeling were used to investigate the interactions among these various factors. The results indicated that the carbon storage of aboveground vegetation first increased, and then, decreased with time. The underground root carbon storage and soil carbon storage at 0–10 cm and 20–30 cm first increased, then decreased, and finally, stabilized. The highest soil carbon storage (0–30 cm) was 102.11 t/ha in 2013, which accounted for 96.61% of the total organic carbon storage. The Shannon–Wiener index, individual number of species, and surface root carbon storage (0–10 cm) significantly increased the carbon storage of surface soil (0–10 cm) (p < 0.05). Compared to natural restoration, artificial restoration over seven years decreased soil carbon storage at 0–30 cm and underground root carbon storage at 0–10 cm (p < 0.05). Consequently, combining artificial restoration with natural restoration can help in establishing a more stable ecosystem faster and in increasing the carbon storage of the ecosystem. It is an effective management measure to promote grassland restoration in arid areas. Also, climate (MAT, MAP) change was closely correlated with plant-soil carbon storage.
Funder
Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education
ey Laboratory of Grassland Management and Utilization in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
Innovation Team of the Ministry of Education—Research on Sustainable Utilization of Grassland Resources
Science and Technology Plan Project, Hohhot
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference55 articles.
1. Climate-soil interactions improve the stability of grassland ecosystem by driving alpine plant diversity;Li;Ecol. Indic.,2022
2. Challenges and opportunities for grassland restoration: A global perspective of best practices in the era of climate change;Lyons;Glob. Ecol. Conserv.,2023
3. United Nations Environment Agency (2023, August 13). Resolution 73/284: United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030). Available online: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N19/060/16/PDF/N1906016.pdf?OpenElement.
4. The Research Progress, Problems and Prospects of Soil Carbon Storage at Home and Aboard;Liu;Chin. J. Sci.,2009
5. Advance in Studies on Carbon Storage and Carbon Process in Grassland Ecostystem of China;Li;Ecol. Environ. Sci.,2014