Non-Lethal Detection of Ranavirus in Fish

Author:

Coutinho Catarina D.1ORCID,Ford Charlotte E.23ORCID,Trafford Joseph D.24,Duarte Ana56ORCID,Rebelo Rui1ORCID,Rosa Gonçalo M.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal

2. Zoological Society of London, Institute of Zoology, Nuffield Building, Outer Circle, London NW8 7LS, UK

3. School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK

4. Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK

5. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal

6. Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal

Abstract

Emergent infectious diseases have an increasing impact on both farmed animals and wildlife. The ability to screen for pathogens is critical for understanding host–pathogen dynamics and informing better management. Ranavirus is a pathogen of concern, associated with disease outbreaks worldwide, affecting a broad range of fish, amphibian, and reptile hosts, but research has been limited. The traditional screening of internal tissues, such as the liver, has been regarded as the most effective for detecting and quantifying Ranavirus. However, such methodology imposes several limitations from ethical and conservation standpoints. Non-lethal sampling methods of viral detection were explored by comparing the efficacy of both buccal swabbing and fin clipping. The study was conducted on two Iberian, threatened freshwater fish (Iberochondrostoma lusitanicum and Cobitis paludica), and all samples were screened using qPCR. While for C. paludica both methods were reliable in detecting Ranavirus, on I. lusitanicum, there was a significantly higher detection rate in buccal swabs than in fin tissue. This study, therefore, reports that fin clipping may yield false Ranavirus negatives when in small-bodied freshwater fish. Overall, buccal swabbing is found to be good as an alternative to more invasive procedures, which is of extreme relevance, particularly when dealing with a threatened species.

Funder

BiodivERsA

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

People’s Trust for Endangered Species

Chester Zoo

Natural Environment Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Virology,Infectious Diseases

Reference53 articles.

1. Laboratory routines cause animal stress;Balcombe;J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci.,2004

2. Assessing stress levels of captive-reared amphibians with hematological data: Implications for conservation initiatives;Davis;J. Herpetol.,2011

3. A comparison of various methods of blood sampling in mice and rats: Effects on animal welfare;Harikrishnan;Lab. Anim.,2018

4. Considering aspects of the 3Rs principles within experimental animal biology;Sneddon;J. Exp. Biol.,2017

5. WOAH (2021). Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals 2021, WOAH.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3