Robotic Vascular Resection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review

Author:

Zecchin Ferrara Victoria1ORCID,Martinino Alessandro2ORCID,Toti Francesco3ORCID,Schilirò Davide2ORCID,Pinto Federico4ORCID,Giovinazzo Francesco567ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy

2. Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA

3. Department of Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20100 Milan, Italy

4. Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA

5. Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00131 Rome, Italy

6. Department of Health Sciences, UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University, 00131 Rome, Italy

7. Department of Surgery, Saint Camillus Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy

Abstract

(1) Background: This study comprehensively compared robotic pancreatic surgery with vascular resection (RPS-VR) to other surgical procedures in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). (2) Methods: A systematic review of relevant literature was conducted to assess a range of crucial surgical and oncological outcomes. (3) Results: Findings indicate that robotic surgery with vascular resections (VRs) significantly prolongs the duration of surgery compared to other surgical procedures, and they notably demonstrate an equal hospital stay. While some studies reported a lower conversion rate and a higher rate of blood loss and blood transfusion in the RPS-VR group, others found no significant disparity. Furthermore, RPS-VR consistently correlated with comparable recurrence rates, free margins R0, postoperative mortality, and complication rates. Concerning the last one, certain reviews reported a higher rate of major complications. Overall survival and disease-free survival remained comparable between the RPS-VR and other surgical techniques in treating PDAC. (4) Conclusions: The analysis emphasizes how RPS-VR is a resembling approach in terms of surgical outcomes and aligns with existing literature findings in this field.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3