Affiliation:
1. School of Catholic Theology, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands
Abstract
I discuss whether animism, the worldview that (some) objects, plants and animals are capable of communication, rational reflection and intentional action, is in conflict with contemporary science. I distinguish two conflicts. The first points to conflicting claims regarding the abilities of objects, plants and animals made by scientists and animists (agential vs. non-agential). I argue that the alleged conflict can be diffused by noting that science and animism advance different ways of looking at the world. The second conflict notes discrepancies between how animists treat nature and all therein (with respect and reverence) and how science does (instrumentalized). I argue that this conflict is more difficult, if not impossible, to overcome.
Reference35 articles.
1. Alaimo, Stacy, and Hekman, Susan (2008). Material Feminisms, Indiana University Press.
2. “Animism” Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology;Current Anthropology,1999
3. From Inert Matter to the Global Society Life as Multi-Level Networks of Processes;Chavalarias;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B,2020
4. Cummins, Robert (2010). The World in the Head, Oxford University Press.
5. Cusack, Carole M. (2011). The Sacred Tree: Ancient and Medieval Manifestations, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.