Scientific Evidence from Space—A Review of Spaceborne Remote Sensing Applications at the Science–Policy Interface

Author:

Bell Alexandra1ORCID,Klein Doris2,Rieser Jakob1ORCID,Kraus Tanja2,Thiel Michael1ORCID,Dech Stefan12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany

2. German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), Münchner Strasse 20, D-82234 Wessling, Germany

Abstract

On a daily basis, political decisions are made, often with their full extent of impact being unclear. Not seldom, the decisions and policy measures implemented result in direct or indirect unintended negative impacts, such as on the natural environment, which can vary in time, space, nature, and severity. To achieve a more sustainable world with equitable societies requires fundamental rethinking of our policymaking. It calls for informed decision making and a monitoring of political impact for which evidence-based knowledge is necessary. The most powerful tool to derive objective and systematic spatial information and, thus, add to transparent decisions is remote sensing (RS). This review analyses how spaceborne RS is used by the scientific community to provide evidence for the policymaking process. We reviewed 194 scientific publications from 2015 to 2020 and analysed them based on general insights (e.g., study area) and RS application-related information (e.g., RS data and products). Further, we classified the studies according to their degree of science–policy integration by determining their engagement with the political field and their potential contribution towards four stages of the policy cycle: problem identification/knowledge building, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy monitoring and evaluation. Except for four studies, we found that studies had not directly involved or informed the policy field or policymaking process. Most studies contributed to the stage problem identification/knowledge building, followed by ex post policy impact assessment. To strengthen the use of RS for policy-relevant studies, the concept of the policy cycle is used to showcase opportunities of RS application for the policymaking process. Topics gaining importance and future requirements of RS at the science–policy interface are identified. If tackled, RS can be a powerful complement to provide policy-relevant evidence to shed light on the impact of political decisions and thus help promote sustainable development from the core.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference251 articles.

1. Sutcliffe, S., and Court, J. (2006). Toolkit for Progressive Policymakers in Developing Countries, Overseas Development Institute.

2. The State of Evidence-Based Policy Evaluation and its Role in Policy Formation;Davies;Natl. Inst. Econ. Rev.,2012

3. OECD (2016). Better Policies for Sustainable Development 2016: A New Framework for Policy Coherence, OECD Publishing.

4. A Brief History of Evidence-Based Policy;Baron;Ann. Am. Acad. Politi- Soc. Sci.,2018

5. Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint;Hoekstra;Science,2014

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3