Enhancing Algorithm Selection through Comprehensive Performance Evaluation: Statistical Analysis of Stochastic Algorithms

Author:

Amin Azad Arif Hama1ORCID,Aladdin Aso M.2ORCID,Hasan Dler O.2ORCID,Mohammed-Taha Soran R.2,Rashid Tarik A.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Financial Accounting and Auditing, College of Commerce, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah 46001, Iraq

2. Computer Science Department, College of Science, Charmo University, Kurdistan Region, Chamchamal 46023, Iraq

3. Computer Science and Engineering Department, University of Kurdistan Hewler, Erbil 44001, Iraq

Abstract

Analyzing stochastic algorithms for comprehensive performance and comparison across diverse contexts is essential. By evaluating and adjusting algorithm effectiveness across a wide spectrum of test functions, including both classical benchmarks and CEC-C06 2019 conference functions, distinct patterns of performance emerge. In specific situations, underscoring the importance of choosing algorithms contextually. Additionally, researchers have encountered a critical issue by employing a statistical model randomly to determine significance values without conducting other studies to select a specific model for evaluating performance outcomes. To address this concern, this study employs rigorous statistical testing to underscore substantial performance variations between pairs of algorithms, thereby emphasizing the pivotal role of statistical significance in comparative analysis. It also yields valuable insights into the suitability of algorithms for various optimization challenges, providing professionals with information to make informed decisions. This is achieved by pinpointing algorithm pairs with favorable statistical distributions, facilitating practical algorithm selection. The study encompasses multiple nonparametric statistical hypothesis models, such as the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, single-factor analysis, and two-factor ANOVA tests. This thorough evaluation enhances our grasp of algorithm performance across various evaluation criteria. Notably, the research addresses discrepancies in previous statistical test findings in algorithm comparisons, enhancing result reliability in the later research. The results proved that there are differences in significance results, as seen in examples like Leo versus the FDO, the DA versus the WOA, and so on. It highlights the need to tailor test models to specific scenarios, as p-value outcomes differ among various tests within the same algorithm pair.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Modeling and Simulation,General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference63 articles.

1. Whatever next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science;Clark;Behav. Brain Sci.,2013

2. Kapur, R. (2018). Research Methodology: Methods and Strategies, Department of Adult Education and Continuing Extension, University of Delhi.

3. Horn, R.V. (1993). Statistical Indicators: For the Economic and Social Sciences, Cambridge University Press.

4. Li, B., Su, P., Chabbi, M., Jiao, S., and Liu, X. (March, January 25). DJXPerf: Identifying Memory Inefficiencies via Object-Centric Profiling for Java. Proceedings of the 21st ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, Montréal, QC, Canada.

5. Li, B., Xu, H., Zhao, Q., Su, P., Chabbi, M., Jiao, S., and Liu, X. (2022, January 21–29). OJXPerf: Featherlight Object Replica Detection for Java Programs. Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3