A Deep Learning Model for Detecting Fake Medical Images to Mitigate Financial Insurance Fraud

Author:

Arshed Muhammad Asad1ORCID,Mumtaz Shahzad2ORCID,Gherghina Ștefan Cristian3ORCID,Urooj Neelam4,Ahmed Saeed15ORCID,Dewi Christine67ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Systems and Technology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54770, Pakistan

2. School of Natural and Computing Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK

3. Department of Finance, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piata Romana, 010374 Bucharest, Romania

4. Institute of Business Management and Administrative Sciences (IBM & AS), The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan

5. Department of Experimental Medical Science, Biomedical Center (BMC), Lund University, 22184 Lund, Sweden

6. Department of Information Technology, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga 50715, Indonesia

7. School of Information Technology, Deakin University, Campus 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence and Deepfake Technologies have brought a new dimension to the generation of fake data, making it easier and faster than ever before—this fake data could include text, images, sounds, videos, etc. This has brought new challenges that require the faster development of tools and techniques to avoid fraudulent activities at pace and scale. Our focus in this research study is to empirically evaluate the use and effectiveness of deep learning models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Patch-based Neural Networks in the context of successful identification of real and fake images. We chose the healthcare domain as a potential case study where the fake medical data generation approach could be used to make false insurance claims. For this purpose, we obtained publicly available skin cancer data and used recently introduced stable diffusion approaches—a more effective technique than prior approaches such as Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)—to generate fake skin cancer images. To the best of our knowledge, and based on the literature review, this is one of the few research studies that uses images generated using stable diffusion along with real image data. As part of the exploratory analysis, we analyzed histograms of fake and real images using individual color channels and averaged across training and testing datasets. The histogram analysis demonstrated a clear change by shifting the mean and overall distribution of both real and fake images (more prominent in blue and green) in the training data whereas, in the test data, both means were different from the training data, so it appears to be non-trivial to set a threshold which could give better predictive capability. We also conducted a user study to observe where the naked eye could identify any patterns for classifying real and fake images, and the accuracy of the test data was observed to be 68%. The adoption of deep learning predictive approaches (i.e., patch-based and CNN-based) has demonstrated similar accuracy (~100%) in training and validation subsets of the data, and the same was observed for the test subset with and without StratifiedKFold (k = 3). Our analysis has demonstrated that state-of-the-art exploratory and deep-learning approaches are effective enough to detect images generated from stable diffusion vs. real images.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference52 articles.

1. Computed Tomography—An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure;Brenner;N. Engl. J. Med.,2007

2. McLean, I.D., and Martensen, J. (2014). Specialized Imaging. Clinical Imaging: With Skeletal, Chest, & Abdominal Pattern Differentials, Mosby. [3rd ed.].

3. Current topic: PACS (picture archiving and communication systems): Filmless radiology;Strickland;Arch. Dis. Child.,2000

4. Security vulnerabilities in healthcare: An analysis of medical devices and software;Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,2023

5. Christiaan, B. (2024, April 28). McAfee Researchers Find Poor Security Exposes Medical Data to Cybercriminals|McAfee Blog. Available online: https://www.mcafee.com/blogs/other-blogs/mcafee-labs/mcafee-researchers-find-poor-security-exposes-medical-data-to-cybercriminals/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3