Author:
Ballentine Debra Scoggins
Abstract
This article promotes the theorizing of myth in ways that facilitate comparison and re-description of data within Biblical Studies. After addressing background categorical issues within Religious Studies and Biblical Studies, I chart the old model of contrasting Bible as Truth with myth, including Eusebius’s antique articulation as well as Romantic notions of myth. Challenging outmoded theories, I identify scholarship that works towards rectification of the category myth, with the aim of bolstering scholarly conversations beyond disciplinary boundaries. Finally, the article suggests rectification of multiple Biblical Studies categories related to myth.
Reference72 articles.
1. Interpretatio Romana
2. Definition;Arnal,2009
3. The Conflict Myth and the Biblical Tradition;Ballentine,2015
4. Foreignization in Ancient Competition;Ballentine;Journal of Religious Competition in Antiquity,2019
5. “Monotheism” and the Hebrew Bible