Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA 90747, USA
Abstract
Our ability to think critically and our disposition to do so can have major implications for our everyday lives. Research across the globe has shown the impact of critical thinking on decisions about our health, politics, relationships, finances, consumer purchases, education, work, and more. This chapter will review some of that research. Given the importance of critical thinking to our everyday lives, the fair and unbiased assessment of critical thinking is useful for guiding educators in their classrooms, for the sake of self-improvement, and in employment decisions. This chapter will also review the psychometric properties of several critical thinking assessments, with a special emphasis on the everyday behaviors predicted by these assessments. The practical challenges faced by test adopters and future directions in the assessment of critical thinking will be discussed.
Reference39 articles.
1. Ali, Marium, and AJLabs (2023). How Many Years Does a Typical User Spend on Social Media?, Al Jazeera. Available online: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/6/30/how-many-years-does-a-typical-user-spend-on-social-media.
2. Arendasy, Martin, Hornke, Lutz, Sommer, Markus, Wagner-Menghin, Michaela, Gittler, Georg, Häusler, Joachim, Bognar, Bettina, and Wenzl, M. (2012). Intelligenz-Struktur-Batterie (Intelligence Structure Battery; INSBAT), Schuhfried GmbH.
3. Arum, Richard, and Roksa, Josipa (2010). Academically Adrift, The University of Chicago Press.
4. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook;Bakshy;Science,2015
5. Bart, William. (2010). The Measurement and Teaching of Critical Thinking Skills, Invited colloquium given at the Center for Research on Education Testing.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献