Reducing Black–White Racial Differences on Intelligence Tests Used in Hiring for Public Safety Jobs

Author:

Goldstein Harold W.1,Yusko Kenneth P.2,Scherbaum Charles A.1,Larson Elliott C.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, USA

2. Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Abstract

This paper explores whether a diversity and inclusion strategy focused on using modern intelligence tests can assist public safety organizations in hiring a talented diverse workforce. Doing so may offer strategies for mitigating the issues of systematic racism with which these occupations have historically struggled. Past meta-analytic research shows that traditional forms of intelligence tests, which are often used in this sector, have not consistently demonstrated predictive validity but have negatively impacted Black candidates. As an alternative, we examine a modern intelligence test that consists of novel unfamiliar cognitive problems that test takers must solve without relying on their prior experience. Across six studies of varying public safety jobs (e.g., police, firefighter) in different organizations, we found a pattern of results that supports the criterion-related validity of the modern intelligence test. In addition to consistently predicting job performance and training success, the modern intelligence test also substantially mitigated the observed Black–White group differences. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of how to alter the legacy of I/O psychology and human resource fields when it comes to our impact on facilitating employment opportunities for Black citizens, particularly in public safety positions.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference79 articles.

1. Implications of modern intelligence research for assessing intelligence in the workplace;Agnello;Human Resource Management Review,2015

2. Understanding the impact of test validity and bias on selection errors and adverse impact in human resource selection;Aguinis;Personnel Psychology,2007

3. The origins and legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;Aiken;Journal of Business and Psychology,2013

4. Flanagan, Dawn P., and Harrison, Patti L. (2005). Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues, Guilford Press.

5. Differential validity and differential prediction of cognitive ability tests: Understanding test bias in the employment context;Berry;Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3