Investigating Planning and Non-Targeted Exploration in PIAAC 2012: Validating Their Measures Based on Process Data and Investigating Their Relationships with Problem-Solving Competency

Author:

Zhang Maoxin1ORCID,Andersson Björn1ORCID,Greiff Samuel2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Educational Measurement, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway

2. Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Abstract

Problem-solving is a critical aspect of intelligence that has become increasingly important in modern society. Mapping out the determinants of success in problem-solving helps understand the underlying cognitive processes involved. This article focuses on two key cognitive processes in problem-solving: non-targeted exploration and planning. We generalize previously defined indicators of planning and non-targeted exploration across tasks in the 2012 Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies and examine the internal construct validity of the indicators using confirmatory factor analysis. We also investigate the relationships between problem-solving competency, planning, and non-targeted exploration, along with the specific dependence between indicators from the same task. The results suggest that (a) the planning indicator across tasks provides evidence of internal construct validity; (b) the non-targeted exploration indicator provides weaker evidence of internal construct validity; (c) overall, non-targeted exploration is strongly related to problem-solving competency, whereas planning and problem-solving competencies are weakly negatively related; and (d) such relationships vary substantially across tasks, emphasizing the importance of accounting for the dependency of measures from the same task. Our findings deepen our understanding of problem-solving processes and can support the use of digital tools in educational practice and validate task design by comparing the task-specific relationships with the desired design.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference49 articles.

1. AERA (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, American Educational Research Association.

2. Age differences in strategic planning as indexed by the Tower of London;Albert;Child Development,2011

3. Sinnott, Jan D. (1989). Everyday Problem Solving: Theory and Applications, Wittenborn.

4. Bartholomew, David J., Knott, Martin, and Moustaki, Irini (2011). Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: A Unified Approach, John Wiley & Sons.

5. Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability;Bell;Journal of Applied Psychology,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3