Training People to Think in Opposites Facilitates the Falsification Process in Wason’s Rule Discovery Task

Author:

Branchini Erika1,Burro Roberto1ORCID,Bianchi Ivana2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Lungadige Porta Vittoria 27, 37129 Verona, Italy

2. Section Philosophy and Human Sciences, Department of Humanities, University of Macerata, Via Garibaldi, 20, 62100 Macerata, Italy

Abstract

With reference to Wason’s 2-4-6 rule discovery task, this study investigated the effects of a simple training session that prompted participants to “think in opposites”. The results showed a significant improvement in performance under the training condition when compared to the control condition, both in terms of the proportion of participants who discovered the correct rule and how quickly it was discovered. An analysis of whether or not participant submitted test triples formed of descending numbers showed that fewer participants under the control condition considered ascending/descending to represent a critical dimension and, in any case, this occurred later (that is, after more test triples) than in the training condition. These results are discussed in relation to previous literature showing improvements in performance that were prompted by strategies involving “contrast” as a critical factor. The limitations of the study are discussed, as well as the benefits of a training program like this, which is non-content related.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference75 articles.

1. Ball, Linden J., and Thompson, Valerie A. (2018). The Routledge International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

2. Falsification cueing in collective reasoning: Example of the wason selection task;Augustinova;European Journal of Social Psychology,2008

3. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4;Bates;Journal of Statistical Software,2015

4. Children’s thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities;Beck;Child Development,2006

5. Bianchi, Ivana, and Branchini, Erika (2023). Does Thinking in Opposites in Order to Think Differently Improve Creativity?. Journal of Intelligence, 11.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3