An Evaluative Review of Barriers to Critical Thinking in Educational and Real-World Settings

Author:

Dwyer Christopher P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Technology Education Research Group (TERG), Department of Teacher Education, Athlone Campus, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, N37 HD68 Westmeath, Ireland

Abstract

Though a wide array of definitions and conceptualisations of critical thinking have been offered in the past, further elaboration on some concepts is required, particularly with respect to various factors that may impede an individual’s application of critical thinking, such as in the case of reflective judgment. These barriers include varying levels of epistemological engagement or understanding, issues pertaining to heuristic-based thinking and intuitive judgment, as well as emotional and biased thinking. The aim of this review is to discuss such barriers and evaluate their impact on critical thinking in light of perspectives from research in an effort to reinforce the ‘completeness’ of extant critical thinking frameworks and to enhance the potential benefits of implementation in real-world settings. Recommendations and implications for overcoming such barriers are also discussed and evaluated.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference136 articles.

1. Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis;Abrami;Review of Educational Research,2015

2. Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis;Abrami;Review of Educational Research,2008

3. The relationship among critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and speaking abilities of Iranian EFL learners;Afshar;Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2014

4. A literature review of critical thinking in engineering education;Ahern;Studies in Higher Education,2019

5. Critical thinking and emotional intelligence skills and relationship with students’ academic achievement;Naderi;Prensa Médica Argentina,2018

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3