Cue Sources and Cue Utilization Patterns of Social Mentalizing during Two-Person Interactions

Author:

Dai Wenwu1,Li Zhaolan1,Jia Ning1

Affiliation:

1. College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China

Abstract

Social mentalizing plays a crucial role in two-person interactions. Depending on the target of inference and the content being inferred, social mentalizing primarily exists in two forms: first-order mentalizing and second-order mentalizing. Our research aims to investigate the cue sources and cue utilization patterns of social mentalizing during two-person interactions. Our study created an experimental situation of a two-person interaction and used the “Spot the difference” game to reveal our research question with multi-stage tasks. Our study was divided into two experiments, Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, which examined the cue sources and cue utilization patterns of first- and second-order mentalizing, respectively. The results of the experiments showed that (1) self-performance and other performance are significant cues utilized by individuals during social mentalizing. (2) Individuals employ discrepancies to modulate the relationship between self-performance and first-order mentalizing as well as to adjust the relationship between otherperformance and second-order mentalizing. The results of this study further complement the dual-processing model of mindreading and the anchoring and adjustment hypothesis during social inference.

Funder

National Post-funded Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences

Hebei Province’s Graduate Student Innovation Ability Training Funding Project

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference29 articles.

1. On what ground do we mentalize? Characteristics of current tasks and sources of information that contribute to mentalizing judgments;Achim;Psychological Assessment,2013

2. Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition;Amodio;Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2006

3. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal;Barr;Journal of Memorylanguage,2013

4. First “egocentric” then “adjustment”: The process of adults’ reasoning about other’s mental states;Chen;Journal of Psychological Science,2011

5. The mechanism of mindreading during general-knowledge question task;Dai;Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3