Validation of a Brief Form of the Self-Administered Multidimensional Prognostic Index: The SELFY-BRIEF-MPI Project

Author:

Morganti Wanda1ORCID,Veronese Nicola2ORCID,Barbagelata Marina1ORCID,Castagna Alberto3,Custodero Carlo4ORCID,Solimando Luisa2,Burgio Marianna Ilarj2,Montana Lampo Sofia Elena2,Seminerio Emanuele1ORCID,Puleo Gianluca1,Senesi Barbara1,Cammalleri Lisa1,Ruotolo Giovanni5,Sabbà Carlo6,Barbagallo Mario2ORCID,Pilotto Alberto14

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospital, 16128 Genoa, Italy

2. Geriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy

3. Primary Care Department, Health District of Soverato, Catanzaro Provincial Health Unit, 88068 Soverato, Italy

4. Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, “Aldo Moro” University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy

5. Geriatric Medicine Department, Azienda Sanitario Ospedaliero “Renato Dulbecco”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

6. Department of Internal Medicine, and Rare Diseases Centre “C. Frugoni”, University Hospital of Bari, 70120 Bari, Italy

Abstract

In clinical practice, self-administered and brief tools to promptly identify older people at risk of frailty are required. The Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), derived from the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) seems reliable enough to serve this purpose, but despite the several versions developed over the past 15 years, it lacks a self-administered and brief version. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the agreement between an abbreviated form of the SELFY-MPI (i.e., SELFY-BRIEF-MPI) and the standard version of the MPI. Four Italian hospitals consecutively enrolled outpatients and inpatients >65 years. The sample included 105 participants (mean age = 78.8 years, 53.3% females). Overall, the two versions showed non-statistically significant differences (Standard-MPI 0.42 ± 0.19 vs.. SELFY-BRIEF-MPI 0.41 ± 0.18; p = 0.104) and a very strong correlation (R = 0.86, p < 0.001). The Bland–Altman Plot revealed that only 5/105 measurements (4.76%) were outside the limits of agreement. The accuracy of the SELFY-BRIEF-MPI in identifying frail people (defined as a Standard-MPI > 0.66) was optimal (area under the curve, AUC = 0.90, p < 0.001). To predict multidimensional frailty, a SELFY-BRIEF-MPI score of 0.60 exhibited the greatest sensitivity/specificity ratio. In conclusion, the SELFY-BRIEF-MPI reported a good agreement with the standard version of the MPI, indicating its application in the screening of multidimensional frailty among older people.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Frailty: Implications for clinical practice and public health;Hoogendijk;Lancet,2019

2. Frailty in elderly people;Clegg;Lancet,2013

3. Prevalence of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Persons: A Systematic Review;Collard;J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.,2012

4. [Frailty prevalence in hospitalized older adults. A systematic review];Abizanda;Rev. Esp. Salud Publica,2021

5. Relationship between depression and frailty in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Soysal;Ageing Res. Rev.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3