Frequency of SARS-CoV-2 Infections among Healthcare Workers in Germany: 3-Year Follow-Up Study
-
Published:2024-07-19
Issue:4
Volume:16
Page:615-627
-
ISSN:2036-7449
-
Container-title:Infectious Disease Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Infectious Disease Reports
Author:
Stammkötter Christian1, Thümmler Laura12ORCID, Korth Johannes34ORCID, Marenbach Beate2, Braß Peer1ORCID, Horn Peter A.2, Lindemann Monika2ORCID, Dittmer Ulf5, Witzke Oliver1, Rohn Hana1, Krawczyk Adalbert15ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Essen, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany 2. Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany 3. Department of Nephrology, University Medicine Essen, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany 4. Practice for Kidney Diseases, Dialysis and Apheresis, 44789 Bochum, Germany 5. Institute for Virology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
Abstract
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in 2019 led to a global pandemic with a significant impact on healthcare systems. Healthcare workers were particularly vulnerable due to frequent contact with COVID-19 patients. Despite vaccination, they remained at higher risk as the vaccines provided limited protection against infection with viral variants, like Delta or Omicron BA.1 and BA.5. Three years after the onset of the pandemic, we evaluated SARS-CoV-2 infection frequencies among healthcare workers with varying levels of patient contact: high-risk (frequent COVID-19 patient contact), intermediate-risk (non-COVID-19 patient contact), and low-risk (no patient contact). We assessed their cellular and humoral immune responses based on their vaccination status and number of prior infections. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were measured by immunoglobulin ELISA, and neutralizing antibody titers were determined against the viral variants D614G, Delta, and Omicron BA.1 and BA.5. Cellular immune responses were analyzed using an interferon-γ ELISpot. Notably, three years into the pandemic, healthcare workers in daily contact with COVID-19 patients did not have higher infection rates compared to healthcare workers with non-COVID-19 patient contact or no patient contact. Immune responses were similar across all groups, highlighting the effectiveness of vaccination and current hygiene standards in preventing virus transmission from patients to staff.
Funder
Stiftung Universitätsmedizin Essen Rudolf Ackermann Foundation COVIM 2.0 network
Reference37 articles.
1. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in the general population: Systematic review;Wien. Klin. Wochenschr.,2021 2. Prevalence and Duration of Acute Loss of Smell or Taste in COVID-19 Patients;Lee;J. Korean Med. Sci.,2020 3. Cegolon, L., Mauro, M., Sansone, D., Tassinari, A., Gobba, F.M., Modenese, A., Casolari, L., Liviero, F., Pavanello, S., and Scapellato, M.L. (2023). A Multi-Center Study Investigating Long COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers from North-Eastern Italy: Prevalence, Risk Factors and the Impact of Pre-Existing Humoral Immunity-ORCHESTRA Project. Vaccines, 11. 4. Why Does the Omicron Variant Largely Spare Olfactory Function? Implications for the Pathogenesis of Anosmia in Coronavirus Disease 2019;Butowt;J. Infect. Dis.,2022 5. Bigdelou, B., Sepand, M.R., Najafikhoshnoo, S., Negrete, J.A.T., Sharaf, M., Ho, J.Q., Sullivan, I., Chauhan, P., Etter, M., and Shekarian, T. (2022). COVID-19 and Preexisting Comorbidities: Risks, Synergies, and Clinical Outcomes. Front. Immunol., 13.
|
|