Abstract
Media portrayals of animal cruelty can shape public understanding and perception of animal welfare law. Given that animal welfare law in Australia is guided partially by ‘community expectations’, the media might indirectly be influencing recent reform efforts to amend maximum penalties in Australia, through guiding and shaping public opinion. This paper reports on Australian news articles which refer to penalties for animal cruelty published between 1 June 2019 and 1 December 2019. Using the electronic database Newsbank, a total of 71 news articles were included for thematic analysis. Three contrasting themes were identified: (1) laws are not good enough; (2) laws are improving; and (3) reforms are unnecessary. We propose a penalty reform cycle to represent the relationship between themes one and two, and ‘community expectations’. The cycle is as follows: media reports on recent amendments imply that ‘laws are improving’ (theme two). Due to a range of inherent factors in the criminal justice system, harsher sentences are not handed down by the courts, resulting in media report of ‘lenient sentencing’ (theme one). Hence, the public become displeased with the penal system, forming the ‘community expectations’, which then fuel future reform efforts. Thus, the cycle continues.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference69 articles.
1. Animal Welfare: At the Interface Between Science and Society;Ohl;Vet. J.,2012
2. Cao, D. Animal Law in Australia, 2015.
3. Beyond the Property Debate: Animal Welfare as a Public Good;Nurse;Contemp. Justice Rev.,2016
4. Companion Animal Cruelty and Neglect in Queensland: Penalties, Sentencing and “Community Expectations”;Geysen;Aust. Anim. Prot. Law J.,2010
5. Morton, R., Hebart, M.L., and Whittaker, A.L. Increasing Maximum Penalties for Animal Welfare Offences in South Australia—Has It Caused Penal Change?. Animals, 2018. 8.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献