Assessing Preferences for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the English Countryside Using Q Methodology

Author:

Hubatova Marie12ORCID,McGinlay James2ORCID,Parsons David J.2,Morris Joe2,Graves Anil R.2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague, U Kříže 8, 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic

2. School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK

Abstract

Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) are difficult to assess due to the subjective and diverse way in which they are experienced. This can make it difficult to apply CES research to enhance human experience of nature. This study applies Q methodology to group people according to their preferences for CES. The Q methodology survey was carried out with 47 local residents and tourists in Wiltshire, in South West England. Four groups of respondents were identified drawing value from nature through: (1) spiritual benefits and mental well-being (Group 1—Inspired by nature); (2) nature and biodiversity conservation (Group 1—Conserving nature); (3) cultural heritage in multifunctional landscapes (Group 3—Countryside mix); and (4) opportunities for outdoor activities (Group 4—Outdoor pursuits). All four groups stated that benefits from nature were enhanced by actually visiting the countryside, through a better understanding of nature itself, and through a range of sensory experiences. They particularly identified relaxation opportunities as a very important CES benefit. These findings, and the demonstrated use of the Q methodology, could support local planning and landscape management in order to provide accessible and functional landscapes that can provide a range of different CES benefits to people.

Funder

European Union

UK Natural Environmental Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change

Reference65 articles.

1. Ferrier, S., Ninan, K.N., Leadley, P., Alkemade, R., Acosta, L.A., Akçakaya, L., Brotons, W.W.L., Cheung, V., Christensen, K.A., and Harhash, J. (2016). The Methodological Assessment Report on Scenarios and Models of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.

2. Biodiversity and cultural ecosystem benefits in lowland landscapes in southern England;King;J. Environ. Psychol.,2017

3. The value of cultural ecosystem services in a rural landscape context;Smith;J. Rural. Stud.,2021

4. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Island Press.

5. Assessing nature’s contributions to people;Diaz;Science,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3