Sustainability Reporting and Organisational Factors

Author:

Zharfpeykan Ramona1ORCID,Askarany Davood1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between sustainability reporting and four factors named as industry, size, ownership type and organisation perspective through the lenses of multiple theories (institutional theory, stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory and theory of planned behaviour). We surveyed 240 Australian and New Zealand companies and asked them about the status of their sustainability reporting as well as their perceptions regarding the importance of sustainability indicators. We used the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) indicators to develop the survey. From an ownership perspective, the results show that companies belonging to the public sector report more sustainability information compared with the private sector. However, from an industry perspective, there were no statistically significant differences between environmentally sensitive and non-environmentally sensitive industries in terms of the content of their sustainability reporting. The results further show that the size of a company does not influence the content of sustainability reporting, but larger firms tend to provide more details in their reports. The results also show a positive relationship between sustainability reporting and organisation perspective (in terms of the level of importance of the GRI indicators). This study contributes to the sustainability literature and reporting theories. Moreover, the results have several implications for managers and promoters of the GRI for improving the adoption of the GRI guidelines and increasing the level of sustainability reporting to amplify the company’s image. The results also allow for effective government policy development through understanding what motivates companies to disclose environmental and social-related activities.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Finance,Economics and Econometrics,Accounting,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference85 articles.

1. Accountability (2020, January 07). AA1000 Accountability Principles Standard 2008. Available online: https://www.accountability.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/AA1000APS-2008.pdf.

2. Ajzen, Icek (2023, January 09). Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Available online: http://people.umass.edu/aizen/tpb.html.

3. The Scope of Applicability of the Standard of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) for Sustainability in the Iraqi’s Environment;Alaraji;Quality-Access to Success,2020

4. Factors influencing the transparency of sustainability information in regional governments: An empirical study;Journal of Cleaner Production,2014

5. Diffusion of sustainability reporting in universities: Current situation and future perspectives;Marimon;Journal of Cleaner Production,2015

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3