Opportunities and Challenges of Geothermal Energy: A Comparative Analysis of Three European Cases—Belgium, Iceland, and Italy
Author:
Meirbekova Rauan1, Bonciani Dario2ORCID, Olafsson Dagur Ingi1, Korucan Aysun34, Derin-Güre Pinar3ORCID, Harcouët-Menou Virginie5ORCID, Bero Wilfried5
Affiliation:
1. ICETEC, Árleynir 2-8, 112 Reykjavík, Iceland 2. Consorzio per lo Sviluppo delle Aree Geotermiche (COSVIG), Via G. Carducci 6, 56044 Larderello, PI, Italy 3. Department of Economics, Middle East Technical University, Inonu Bulvari, Ankara 06800, Türkiye 4. Energy Market Regulatory Authority, Ankara 06510, Türkiye 5. Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Abstract
Geothermal energy is a unique energy source in the energy policy mix that would help the clean energy transition and energy independence, supporting the energy needs in heating and electricity. Although there have been studies on the opportunities and challenges of renewable energy, this paper is the first paper that concentrates on geothermal energy for three distinct countries, Italy, Belgium, and Iceland, for the first time. Using semi-structured interviews that will cover the stakeholders representing the quadruple helix (academia, citizens, policymakers, and industry), this paper aims to find the unique and common opportunities and barriers the geothermal sector has. Shared challenges include financial barriers, regulatory complexities, environmental issues, and the need for improvement in the social acceptability of geothermal energy. Despite these challenges, geothermal energy, a promising energy source for clean transition, could create opportunities like improved household welfare through combined uses in district heating and electricity and have the potential to generate employment opportunities.
Funder
EU H2020 Project GeoSmart: Technologies for geothermal to enhance competitiveness in smart and flexible operation
Reference60 articles.
1. IRENA (2024, April 30). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Available online: https://mc-cd8320d4-36a1-40ac-83cc-3389-cdn-endpoint.azureedge.net/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2023/Aug/IRENA_Renewable_power_generation_costs_in_2022.pdf?rev=1ae772b0f1ef4c2580bfe4bc620973b9. 2. Life cycle assessment of geothermal power plants: A comparison with other energy conversion technologies;Zuffi;Geothermics,2022 3. Basosi, R., Bonciani, R., Frosali, D., Manfrida, G., Parisi, M.L., and Sansone, F. (2020). Life Cycle Analysis of a Geothermal Power Plant: Comparison of the Environmental Performance with Other Renewable Energy Systems. Sustainability, 12. 4. Horton, J., Macve, R., and Struyven, G. (2004). Qualitative research: Experiences in using semi-structured interviews. Real Life Guide to Accounting Research, Elsevier. 5. Hoes, H., Dupont, N., Lagrou, D., and Petitclerc, E. (2021, January 24–27). Status and development on deep geothermal energy use in Belgium, a new momentum for deep geothermal energy production growth. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress 2020, Reykjavik, Iceland.
|
|