Predicting Longitudinal Cognitive Decline and Alzheimer’s Conversion in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients Based on Plasma Biomarkers
Author:
Park Min-Koo12ORCID, Ahn Jinhyun3ORCID, Kim Young-Ju4, Lee Ji-Won2, Lee Jeong-Chan2, Hwang Sung-Joo5, Kim Keun-Cheol1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea 2. Hugenebio Institute, Bio-Innovation Park, Erom, Inc., Chuncheon 24427, Republic of Korea 3. Department of Management Information Systems, College of Economics & Commerce, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Republic of Korea 4. Department of Statistics, Division of Economics & Information Statistics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea 5. Integrated Medicine Institute, Loving Care Hospital, Seongnam 463400, Republic of Korea
Abstract
The increasing burden of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) emphasizes the need for effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Despite available treatments targeting amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques, disease-modifying therapies remain elusive. Early detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients at risk for AD conversion is crucial, especially with anti-Aβ therapy. While plasma biomarkers hold promise in differentiating AD from MCI, evidence on predicting cognitive decline is lacking. This study’s objectives were to evaluate whether plasma protein biomarkers could predict both cognitive decline in non-demented individuals and the conversion to AD in patients with MCI. This study was conducted as part of the Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia (KLOSCAD), a prospective, community-based cohort. Participants were based on plasma biomarker availability and clinical diagnosis at baseline. The study included MCI (n = 50), MCI-to-AD (n = 21), and cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 40) participants. Baseline plasma concentrations of six proteins—total tau (tTau), phosphorylated tau at residue 181 (pTau181), amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42), amyloid beta 40 (Aβ40), neurofilament light chain (NFL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)—along with three derivative ratios (pTau181/tTau, Aβ42/Aβ40, pTau181/Aβ42) were analyzed to predict cognitive decline over a six-year follow-up period. Baseline protein biomarkers were stratified into tertiles (low, intermediate, and high) and analyzed using a linear mixed model (LMM) to predict longitudinal cognitive changes. In addition, Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to discern whether protein biomarkers could predict AD conversion in the MCI subgroup. This prospective cohort study revealed that plasma NFL may predict longitudinal declines in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. In participants categorized as amyloid positive, the NFL biomarker demonstrated predictive performance for both MMSE and total scores of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-TS) longitudinally. Additionally, as a baseline predictor, GFAP exhibited a significant association with cross-sectional cognitive impairment in the CERAD-TS measure, particularly in amyloid positive participants. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis indicated predictive performance of NFL, GFAP, tTau, and Aβ42/Aβ40 on MCI-to-AD conversion. This study suggests that plasma GFAP in non-demented participants may reflect baseline cross-sectional CERAD-TS scores, a measure of global cognitive function. Conversely, plasma NFL may predict longitudinal decline in MMSE and CERAD-TS scores in participants categorized as amyloid positive. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis suggests that NFL, GFAP, tTau, and Aβ42/Aβ40 are potentially robust predictors of future AD conversion.
Funder
National IT industry Promotion Agency National Research Foundation of Korea ICT
Reference47 articles.
1. Dementia Forecasting. Estimation of the Global Prevalence of Dementia in 2019 and Forecasted Prevalence in 2050: An Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019;Collaborators;Lancet Public Health,2022 2. Gauthier, S., Webster, C., Servaes, S., Morais, J.A., and Rosa-Neto, P. (2024, March 12). World Alzheimer Report 2022: Life after Diagnosis: Navigating Treatment, Care and Support. Alzheimer’s Disease International. Available online: https://www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2022/. 3. Huang, L.-K., Kuan, Y.-C., Lin, H.-W., and Hu, C.-J. (2023). Clinical Trials of New Drugs for Alzheimer Disease: A 2020–2023 Update. J. Biomed. Sci., 30. 4. The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alz-heimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease;Albert;Alzheimers Dement.,2011 5. The Complex Burden of Determining Prevalence Rates of Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review;Casagrande;Front. Psychiatry,2022
|
|