Emerging Treatments Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment for Advanced Chondrosarcoma
Author:
Ingangi Vincenzo1, De Chiara Annarosaria2, Ferrara Gerardo2, Gallo Michele3, Catapano Antonio3, Fazioli Flavio3, Di Carluccio Gioconda1, Peranzoni Elisa4ORCID, Marigo Ilaria45ORCID, Carriero Maria Vincenza1ORCID, Minopoli Michele1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Preclinical Models of Tumor Progression Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS ‘Fondazione G. Pascale’, 80131 Naples, Italy 2. Histopathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS ‘Fondazione G. Pascale’, 80131 Naples, Italy 3. Musculoskeletal Surgery Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS ‘Fondazione G. Pascale’, 80131 Naples, Italy 4. Immunology and Molecular Oncology Diagnostics, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy 5. Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padua, Italy
Abstract
Chondrosarcoma (ChS), a malignant cartilage-producing tumor, is the second most frequently diagnosed osseous sarcoma after osteosarcoma. It represents a very heterogeneous group of malignant chemo- and radiation-resistant neoplasms, accounting for approximately 20% of all bone sarcomas. The majority of ChS patients have a good prognosis after a complete surgical resection, as these tumors grow slowly and rarely metastasize. Conversely, patients with inoperable disease, due to the tumor location, size, or metastases, represent a great clinical challenge. Despite several genetic and epigenetic alterations that have been described in distinct ChS subtypes, very few therapeutic options are currently available for ChS patients. Therefore, new prognostic factors for tumor progression as well as new treatment options have to be explored, especially for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease. Recent studies have shown that a correlation between immune infiltrate composition, tumor aggressiveness, and survival does exist in ChS patients. In addition, the intra-tumor microvessel density has been proven to be associated with aggressive clinical behavior and a high metastatic potential in ChS. This review will provide an insight into the ChS microenvironment, since immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents are emerging as interesting therapeutic options for ChS patients.
Funder
Italian Ministry of Health
Reference133 articles.
1. Pathology of Primary Malignant Bone and Cartilage Tumours;Rozeman;Int. Orthop.,2006 2. Hogendoorn, P.C.W., Bovée, J., Nielsen, G.P., Fletcher, C.D.M., Bridge, J.A., Hogendoorn, P.C.W., and Mertens, F. (2013). Chondrosarcoma (grades I–III), including primary and secondary variants and periosteal chondrosarcoma. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, IARC. [4th ed.]. 3. Chondrosarcoma in the United States (1973 to 2003): An Analysis of 2890 Cases from the SEER Database;Giuffrida;J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am.,2009 4. Incidence, Outcomes and Prognostic Factors during 25 Years of Treatment of Chondrosarcomas;Ho;Surg. Oncol.,2018 5. Wells, M.E., Childs, B.R., Eckhoff, M.D., Rajani, R., Potter, B.K., and Polfer, E.M. (2021). Atypical Cartilaginous Tumors: Trends in Management. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. Glob. Res. Rev., 5.
|
|