Affiliation:
1. Institute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA
2. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA
Abstract
Recycling of unnecessary or dysfunctional cellular structures through autophagy plays a critical role in cellular homeostasis and environmental resilience. Therefore, the autophagy trait may have been unintentionally selected in wheat breeding programs for higher yields in arid climates. This hypothesis was tested by measuring the response of three common autophagy markers, ATG7, ATG8, and NBR1, to a heat wave under reduced soil moisture content in 16 genetically diverse spring wheat landraces originating from different geographical locations. We observed in the greenhouse trials that ATG8 and NBR1 exhibited genotype-specific responses to a 1 h, 40 °C heat wave, while ATG7 did not show a consistent response. Three genotypes from Uruguay, Mozambique, and Afghanistan showed a pattern consistent with higher autophagic activity: decreased or stable abundance of both ATG8 and NBR1 proteins, coupled with increased transcription of ATG8 and NBR1. In contrast, three genotypes from Pakistan, Ethiopia, and Egypt exhibited elevated ATG8 protein levels alongside reduced or unaltered ATG8 transcript levels, indicating a potential suppression or no change in autophagic activity. Principal component analysis demonstrated a correlation between lower abundance of ATG8 and NBR1 proteins and higher yield in the field trials. We found that (i) the combination of heat and drought activated autophagy only in several genotypes, suggesting that despite being a resilience mechanism, autophagy is a heat-sensitive process; (ii) higher autophagic activity correlates positively with greater yield; (iii) the lack of autophagic activity in some high-yielding genotypes suggests contribution of alternative stress-resilient mechanisms; and (iv) enhanced autophagic activity in response to heat and drought was independently selected by wheat breeding programs in different geographic locations.
Funder
USDA-NIFA
FFAR
NSF-CAREER
Washington Grain Commission
OA Vogel Wheat Research Fund
Reference97 articles.
1. Erenstein, O., Jaleta, M., Mottaleb, K.A., Sonder, K., Donovan, J., and Braun, H.-J. (2022). Global Trends in Wheat Production, Consumption and Trade. Wheat Improvement, Springer International Publishing.
2. Wheat yield loss attributable to heat waves, drought and water excess at the global, national and subnational scales;Zampieri;Environ. Res. Lett.,2017
3. IPCC Summary for Policymakers (2022). Climate Change and Land, Cambridge University Press.
4. Wheat Initiative (2024, July 03). Wheat Initiative: An International Vision for Wheat Improvement. Available online: https://static1.squarespace.com-/static/5cbee3f7817c12000111998c/t/65699f4e492f4b226cf1ca12/1701420879879/WheatInitiative_VisionDocument2013.pdf.
5. Reynolds, M., and Braun, H.-J. (2022). Wheat Improvement: Food Security in a Changing Climate, Springer International Publishing.