Medial Rectus Disinsertion for the Management of Large-Angle Sensory Esotropia

Author:

Han So Young1ORCID,Chun Bo Young23ORCID,Lee Hye Jin45,Kim Hyun Kyung6,Kwon Mi Sun2,Lee Ho Seok7,Rhiu Soolienah7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Republic of Korea

2. Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea

3. Brain Science & Engineering Institute, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea

4. Department of Ophthalmology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Republic of Korea

5. Department of Ophthalmology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju 63241, Republic of Korea

6. Department of Ophthalmology, Hangil Eye Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon 21388, Republic of Korea

7. Department of Ophthalmology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Hwaseong-si 18450, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The aim of the report is to report the outcomes of the medial rectus (MR) disinsertion procedure for the management of large-angle esotropia (ET) patients. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective case series of patients with large-angle ET who underwent an MR disinsertion procedure between March 2012 to April 2022. The procedure happened accidentally during muscle surgery. The demographic and clinical data, including sex, age, visual acuity, pre- and postoperative angle of strabismus, duction limitations, results of intraoperative forced duction tests, and follow-up duration were collected from medical records. Results: Five patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 62.2 ± 9.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 24.8 ± 8.7 months. The ET at the primary position of gaze was 92.0 ± 17.9 prism diopters (PD) before MR disinsertion and 38.0 ± 29.5 PD after MR disinsertion only. Abduction deficiency was −4 before after MR disinsertion, which improved to −1 at the last follow-up. Conclusions: The results of MR disinsertion were not as frustrating as anticipated. MR disinsertion may be considered in patients with large-angle sensory ET who refuse surgery on the opposite eye.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3