Is the Small Ossicle of Type 1 Accessory Navicular a Cause of Foot Pain?—A Case Report

Author:

Yokoe Takuji1ORCID,Uemichi Kazushi2,Tajima Takuya1,Chosa Etsuo1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Medicine of Sensory and Motor Organs, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobayashi City Hospital, 2235-3 Hosono, Kobayashi, Miyazaki 886-0004, Japan

Abstract

Background and objectives: An accessory navicular (AN) bone is often classified into types 1–3 according to the Veitch classification, and symptomatic type 1 patients usually receive non-surgical treatment. However, there are cases in which AN cannot be classified into one of these three types using this classification system, and the small ossicle of type 1 AN may not be the cause of foot pain. This report aimed to present a case of symptomatic type 1 AN that required surgical treatment without the excision of the small ossicle after long-term conservative treatment had failed. Case presentation: A 15-year-old girl who was diagnosed with symptomatic type 1 AN was referred to our department. Medial-side foot pain had prevented her from playing soccer well. She had been treated conservatively for type 1 AN for more than 12 months at several orthopedic clinics. Tenderness of the prominent navicular tubercle was identified, and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings suggested that the cause of her foot pain was derived from the prominent navicular tubercle not the small ossicle itself. Osteotomy of the prominent navicular tubercle with the advancement of the tibialis posterior tendon, without excision of the ossicle, was performed. At the 12-month follow-up examination, she was completely free from foot pain, and the patient-reported outcome measures were excellent. She now plays soccer at the pre-injury level. Conclusions: We report the case of a patient with symptomatic type 1 AN who underwent osteotomy of the prominent navicular tubercle with advancement of the tibialis posterior tendon, without excision of the ossicle, and who showed favorable short-term clinical outcomes. The evaluation of symptomatic patients with AN based on the Veitch classification alone may lead to inappropriate management. The small ossicle of type 1 AN was not the cause of foot pain in the present case.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. The Painful Accessory Navicular: A Clinical and Histopathological Study;Grogan;Foot Ankle,1989

2. Incidence and anatomical variations of accessory navicular bone in patients with foot pain: A retrospective radiographic analysis;Kalbouneh;Clin. Anat.,2017

3. Assessing the Outcomes Associated with Accessory Navicular Bone Surgery—A Systematic Review;Wariach;Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med.,2022

4. Evaluation of the Kidner Procedure in Treatment of Symptomatic Accessory Tarsal Scaphoid;Veitch;Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.,1978

5. Comparison of outcomes of osteosynthesis in type II accessory navicular by variable fixation methods;Jang;Foot Ankle Surg.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3