Affiliation:
1. Cardiovascular Institute “Dedinje”, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia
2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
3. Clinical Center of University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
Background and Objectives. Distinct pressure curve differences exist between akinetic (A-LVA) and dyskinetic (D-LVA) aneurysms. In D-LVA, left ventricular (LV) ejection pressure decreases relative to the aneurysm size, whereas A-LVA does not impact pressure curves, indicating that the decrease in stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output is proportional to the size of dyskinesia. This study aimed to assess the frequency of A-LVA and D-LVA, determine aneurysm size parameters (volume and surface area), and evaluate predictive parameters using echocardiography in A-LVA and D-LVA. Furthermore, it aimed to compare individual echocardiographic parameters, according to ejection fraction (EF) and SV, with hemodynamic events shown in experimental models of A-LVA and D-LVA and their significance in everyday clinical practice. Materials and Methods. This clinical study included patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) admitted to the cardiovascular institute ‘’Dedinje”, Serbia. Echocardiographic volume and surface area of LV and LVA were determined (by the area–length method) along with EF (by Simpson’s method). Results. A-LVA was present in 62.9% of patients, while D-LVA was present in 37.1%. Patients with D-LVA had significantly higher systolic aneurysm volume (LVAVs) (94.07 ± 74.66 vs. 51.54 ± 53.09, p = 0.009), systolic aneurysm surface area (LVAAs) (23.22 ± 11.73 vs. 16.41 ± 8.58, p = 0.018), and end-systolic left ventricular surface areas (LVESA) (50.79 ± 13.33 vs. 42.76 ± 14.11, p = 0.045) compared to patients with A-LVA. The ratio of LVA volume to LV volume was higher in the D-LVA in systole (LVAVs/LVESV). The end-diastolic volume of LV (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume of LV (LVESV) did not significantly differ between D-LVA and A-LVA. EF (21.25 ± 11.92 vs. 28.18 ± 11.91, p = 0.044) was significantly lower among patients with D-LVA. Conclusions. Differentiating between A-LVA and D-LVA using echocardiography is crucial since D-LVA causes greater hemodynamic disturbances in LV function, and thus surgical resection of the aneurysm or LV reconstruction must have a positive effect regardless of myocardial revascularization surgery.
Reference26 articles.
1. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European society of cardiology (ESC);Ibanez;Eur. Heart J.,2018
2. LV aneurysm and the prediction of LV enlargement studied by 2-D echo: Quantitative analysis of aneurysm size in relation to clinical cause;Matsumoto;Circulation,1985
3. Simulation of left ventricular function during dyskinetic or akinetic aneurysm;Sever;Bosn. J. Basic. Med. Sci.,2012
4. Die linksventrikuläre Funktion in Ruhe und unter Belastung bei Patienten mit postinfarziellem Herzwandaneurysma;Maiseizik;Herz/Kreislauf,1993
5. Boyette, L.C., and Manna, B. (2024, May 20). Physiology, Myocardial Oxygen Demand. StatPearls, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499897/.