Efficacy and Safety of Artificial Tears Containing Lipidure and Hypromellose for the Treatment of Moderate Dry Eye Disease in Contact Lens Wearers

Author:

Gagliano Caterina12ORCID,Zeppieri Marco3ORCID,Longo Antonio4,Rubegni Giovanni45,Amato Roberta2,Foti Roberta2ORCID,Cappellani Francesco46ORCID,Cocuzza Massimiliano4ORCID,Visalli Federico4,Cannizzaro Ludovica4,Avitabile Alessandro4,Gagliano Giuseppe4,Lapenna Lucia7,D’Esposito Fabiana89ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna “Kore”, Piazza dell’Università, 94100 Enna, Italy

2. Eye Clinic, Catania University, San Marco Hospital, Viale Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, 95121 Catania, Italy

3. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy

4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Catania, Piazza Università, 95123 Catania, Italy

5. Ophthalmology Unit, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy

6. Willis Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

7. Department of Ophthalmology, Di Venere’s Hospital of Bari, Via Ospedale di Venere, 1, 70012 Bari, Italy

8. Imperial College Ophthalmic Research Group (ICORG) Unit, Imperial College, London NW1 5QH, UK

9. GENOFTA Srl, Sant’Agnello, 80065 Naples, Italy

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Dry eye disease (DED) affects 5–50% of the global population and deeply influences everyday life activities. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of novel Respilac artificial tears containing lipidure and hypromellose (HPMC) with the widely used Nextal artificial tears, which are also HPMC-based, for the treatment of moderate DED in contact lenses (CL) wearers. Materials and Methods: In a prospective, single-center, randomized investigation, 30 patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with moderate DED, and wearing CL were randomly assigned to the Respilac (n = 15) or Nextal group (n = 15). Patients self-administrated one drop of Respilac or Nextal in both eyes three times daily for 21 days. Changes in the endpoint (visual analogue scale (VAS) score for ocular tolerability, symptom assessment in dry eye (SANDE) score, non-invasive first break-up time (NIF-BUT) results, tear analysis value, meibography results, and CL tolerability results were assessed, comparing treatment groups and time-point evaluations. Adverse events (AEs) were also recorded and evaluated. Results: VAS scores decreased with time (p < 0.001) in both groups, showing no statistically significant difference among them (p = 0.13). Improvements were also detected from screening to end-of-treatment, which were indicated by the SANDE scores for severity and frequency (p < 0.001) and by tear analysis results (p < 0.001) with no observed difference between the Nextal and Respilac arms. NIF-BUT, meibography, and CL tolerability values were shown to be non-significantly affected by treatment and time. There were no AEs detected in this study cohort. Conclusions: Respilac was confirmed to be effective, safe, and well-tolerated. Lipidure-based ophthalmic solution was shown not to be inferior to the currently used Nextal, however, showing improvements in DED symptoms. Within the existing literature, our study is one of the first to report that MPC plus HPMC-containing eye drops are an effective option for the treatment of moderate dry eye disease and desiccation damage prevention in contact lens wearers.

Funder

FIDIA S.P.A.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference36 articles.

1. A Patient Questionnaire Approach to Estimating the Prevalence of Dry Eye Symptoms in Patients Presenting to Optometric Practices across Canada;Doughty;Optom. Vis. Sci. Off. Publ. Am. Acad. Optom.,1997

2. Contact Lens-Associated Dry Eye Disease: Recent Advances Worldwide and in Japan;Kojima;Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,2018

3. Treatment of Contact Lens Related Dry Eye with Antibacterial Honey;Wong;Contact Lens Anterior Eye J. Br. Contact Lens Assoc.,2017

4. The Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Dry Eye Disease;Messmer;Dtsch. Arztebl. Int.,2015

5. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report;Stapleton;Ocul. Surf.,2017

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3