Infiltration by Intratumor and Stromal CD8 and CD68 in Cervical Cancer

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a major role in neoplastic development. Various types of cells can be found in the TME. These cells can be classified into two groups, immunosuppressive and immunostimulatory types, depending on the function they perform in the antitumor immune response (IR). By interacting both with each other and with tumor cells, different immune mechanisms are activated or inhibited, which can suppress or promote the development and progression of cervical cancer (CC). Our aim was to investigate some of the main components of the cellular immune response in TME—tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells (Tc, CD8+) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs, CD68+)—in patients with CC. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 72 paraffin-embedded tumor tissues of patients diagnosed and treated at Medical University Pleven, Bulgaria. Patients were classified according to the 2018 FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) classification. From each patient, we selected one histological slide with hematoxylin eosin staining. In a microscopic evaluation, CD8+ T lymphocytes and CD68+-positive macrophages were counted in the tumor and stroma of five randomly selected fields at ×40 magnification (HPF). We analyzed the relationship between intratumoral and stromal CD8 and CD68 expression and FIGO stage and N status. Results: There was no significant association between the expression levels of intratumoral and stromal CD68+ cells in the different FIGO stages and according to the lymph nodes’ involvement. For CD8+ cells, the association of stromal infiltration was also not found, but T intratumor infiltration was associated with a higher FIGO stage, despite the fact that the results did not reach significance (p = 0.063, Fisher test). Intratumoral CD8+ cells were significantly associated with positive N status, (p = 0.035). Discussion: The separation of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells and tumor-associated macrophages into intratumoral and stromal is inconsequential. In our study, the level of infiltration of CD68+ cells in tumors and stromata was not significantly associated with tumor progression or lymph node involvement. The results were different for CD8+ cells, in which levels of infiltration were associated with lymph nodes’ statuses. Conclusions: The separate evaluation of CD68+ immune cells in the TME as intratumoral and stromal is not beneficial for defining prognoses, since the presence of these cells is not associated with the patient’s stage. In our study, the presence of CD8+ cells was significantly associated with lymph node metastases. The prognostic value of the obtained results can be enriched with an additional study of the lymphocyte phenotype, including B and other subtypes of T lymphocytes, NK cells, as well as molecules involved in the immune response, such as HLA subtypes.