Affiliation:
1. Specialist Registrar in Breast Surgery, Princess Royal University Hospital, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
2. Specialist Registrar in Breast Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK
3. Senior Clinical Fellow in Breast Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK
4. Consultant in Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Wide local excision is a common procedure in the treatment of breast cancer. Wire-guided localisation (WGL) has been the gold standard for many years; however, several issues have been identified with this technique, and therefore, wire-free techniques have been developed. This scoping review synthesises the available literature comparing wire-guided localisation with the wire-free techniques used in breast-conserving cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: Multiple databases including Pubmed and MEDLINE were used to search articles between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2022. Terms included “breast neoplasms”, “margins of excision”, and “reoperation”. In total, 34/256 papers were selected for review. Comparisons were made between positive margins and re-excision rates of WGL with wire-free techniques including SAVI SCOUT, Magseed, ROLL, and RSL. Pooled p-values were calculated using chi-square testing to determine statistical significance. Results: Pooled analysis demonstrated statistically significant reductions in positive margins and re-excision rates when SAVI SCOUT, RSL, and ROLL were compared with WGL. When SAVI SCOUT was compared to WGL, there were fewer re-excisions {(8.6% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.0001) and positive margins (10.6% vs. 15.0%; p = 0.0105)}, respectively. This was also the case in the ROLL and RSL groups. When compared to WGL; lower re-excision rates and positive margins were noted {(12.6% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.0007), (17.0% vs. 22.9%; p = 0.0268)} for ROLL and for RSL, respectively {(6.8% vs. 14.9%),(12.36% vs. 21.4%) (p = 0.0001)}. Magseed localisation demonstrated lower rates of re-excision than WGL (13.44% vs. 15.42%; p = 0.0534), but the results were not statistically significant. Conclusions: SAVI SCOUT, Magseed, ROLL, and RSL techniques were reviewed. Pooled analysis indicates wire-free techniques, specifically SAVI SCOUT, ROLL, and RSL, provide statistically significant reductions in re-excision rates and positive margin rates compared to WGL. However, additional studies and systematic analysis are required to ascertain superiority between techniques.
Reference59 articles.
1. (2023, March 27). Cancer Research UK. Breast Cancer Statistics. Available online: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer#heading-Zero.
2. (2023, March 27). The Second All Breast Cancer Report; NCIN National Cancer Intelligence Network; West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit; BCCOM. Available online: http://www.ncin.org.uk/view.aspx?rid=612.
3. Nealton, T.P. (1965). Management of the Patient with Cancer, Saunders.
4. Novel wire-free techniques for localization of impalpable breast lesions-A review of current options;Norman;Breast J.,2021
5. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) for non-palpable breast cancer: A comparison between day-before and same-day protocols;Aydogan;Breast,2010
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献